Caps required payments at no more than 20 percent of a student’s income and ensures no payments are owed when income falls below a minimum affordability threshold.
Cap required payments on outcomes-based financing products at no more than 20 percent of student income and require no payments below a minimum affordability threshold.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The bill text proposed federal rules for income-share agreements, including a cap preventing total income-share rates from exceeding 20 percent and borrower protections tied to a minimum income threshold before payments are owed.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Congress.gov records S.2114 as introduced in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Finance, with no recorded enactment action.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Young’s Senate office announced bipartisan introduction of legislation to regulate income-share agreements and protect students using those financing products.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The CFPB took enforcement action involving income-share agreements and treated the products as consumer credit/private education loans subject to federal consumer-finance requirements.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
A current Congress.gov legislation search did not identify a newly enacted federal law in the June 7, 2026 to July 6, 2026 lookback window delivering the 20 percent cap and no-payment threshold for outcomes-based student financing products.
Assessments
Young materially advanced the promised policy by sponsoring S.2114, the ISA Student Protection Act of 2019, which included both a 20 percent income-share cap and a no-payment obligation below a low-income threshold. But the bill was only introduced and referred to the Senate Finance Committee, with no enactment, and later CFPB enforcement activity addressed ISA consumer-protection issues without creating the promised federal cap and affordability threshold. Because the substantive outcome was not delivered despite a serious legislative attempt, this is best scored as not fulfilled with effort credit.