We again insist that you follow the law, refuse to implement President Trump’s Executive Order, and withdraw this presidentially-directed proposed rule.
USPS should follow the law, refuse to implement President Trump's executive order restricting vote-by-mail, withdraw the proposed rule, and return to its core mission of providing universal postal services rather than administering elections.
Occurrences
Evidence
EO 14399 directed the Postmaster General to initiate USPS rulemaking on mail-in and absentee ballots within 60 days, including ballot envelope standards, state-specific mail-in/absentee participation lists, and a provision that USPS would not transmit ballots unless individuals were enrolled on such a list.
USPS proposed amendments to the Domestic Mail Manual consistent with Section 3 of EO 14399. The proposal would require enrollment through a Federal Ballot Mail Portal, collection of voter names, addresses, and barcode identifiers, and says noncompliant outbound federal ballot mailings would not be accepted and would be returned.
The proposed rule also states USPS would continue longstanding Election Mail practices for processing and delivering ballots that enter the mailstream, including extraordinary measures to deliver completed ballots before the November 3, 2026 general election.
AP reported that Judge Indira Talwani halted Trump's order for the 2026 midterm cycle and held that provisions creating a federal eligible-voter list and using USPS to determine who can receive a mail ballot were legally void because they violated separation of powers.
The Guardian reported that Judge Emmet Sullivan blocked a USPS plan to deny ballot deliveries to states that did not provide voter-roll data or adopt new procedures, finding the plan inconsistent with a 2021 settlement requiring USPS to ensure timely election-mail delivery through 2028.
AP reported that nine Democratic governors, including Rhode Island's governor, asked USPS to withdraw the proposed rule after a federal judge blocked the executive order. AP also reported USPS had filed the proposed rule in late May and did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Assessments
The promised outcome was not fully delivered: USPS did not refuse implementation or withdraw the proposed rule; it issued the ballot-mail proposal tied to EO 14399, and available evidence says the rule remained pending. However, federal court rulings blocked key implementation of the executive order for the 2026 cycle and preserved ballot-delivery obligations, which partially achieved the anti-implementation and universal-service objectives. Because those outcomes occurred during Reed's current Senate term but were driven mainly by courts and other officials rather than a clearly documented Reed-led action, this merits partial credit, not full delivery.