Graham said he will continue pushing to change birthright citizenship and make it a top Judiciary Committee priority next year.
Continue pushing to change birthright citizenship and make it a top Judiciary Committee priority next year.
Occurrences
Evidence
Within the lookback window, The Guardian reported that the Supreme Court rejected Trump’s birthright-citizenship order and that Graham said he had pursued legislation and a constitutional amendment for years and remained determined to end birthright citizenship.
The current U.S. Code still lists as citizens at birth persons born in the United States and subject to U.S. jurisdiction, without the parent-status restriction Graham has advocated.
The Supreme Court described Executive Order 14160 as identifying circumstances where U.S.-born persons would not be recognized as citizens, and noted the challengers alleged violations of the Citizenship Clause and nationality statute. The Court addressed injunction scope, not the merits.
The executive order directed federal agencies not to recognize citizenship for certain U.S.-born children when the mother was unlawfully present or temporarily present and the father was not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.
Axios reported that Graham praised Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship by executive order and said he would introduce legislation along similar lines.
Assessments
Graham did continue to advocate ending or restricting birthright citizenship and publicly said he would introduce aligned legislation, which supports serious effort. However, the promised substantive outcome was not delivered: federal birthright-citizenship law remains unchanged, and later executive action by President Trump was litigated without a merits ruling upholding the change. The record provided does not show Graham successfully making and completing this as a top Judiciary Committee priority in the promised next year, nor enactment of the citizenship restriction. Credit is therefore for effort, not fulfillment.