Murray, Murphy Urge Watchdog to Investigate Trump Admin's Use of Taxpayer Dollars for Trump's Ballroom; request that GAO investigate and provide a legal decision
Call on the Government Accountability Office to investigate and issue a legal decision on the Trump administration's use of taxpayer dollars for Trump's ballroom project.
Occurrences
Evidence
AP reported that more than $350 million from Trump's tax-and-spending law was directed to White House security accounts and that Democrats warned it appeared to help fund the ballroom project. AP also reported the shift came after Congress rejected a $1 billion White House request and while the project remained in legal challenges.
The Guardian reported that $340.8 million was placed in an OMB account labeled Procurement, Construction, and Improvements on June 12, with another $10.75 million in Operations and Support, after Congress refused $1 billion for the East Wing Modernization Project.
The Guardian reported that Senate Republicans formally dropped the $1 billion ballroom-security proposal from revised text after procedural problems and Democratic opposition; Schumer said Democrats had killed the taxpayer-funded ballroom money.
The Daily Beast reported that Sen. Patty Murray, top Democrat on Senate Appropriations, criticized the $1 billion proposal as an “outrageous betrayal” of families needing lower costs rather than a golden ballroom.
The Washington Post reported that Sen. Adam Schiff and colleagues demanded a complete accounting of ballroom financing and that Schiff sent his request to the Government Accountability Office.
The Washington Post reported that a federal judge halted construction and ruled Trump lacked authority to fund the estimated $400 million ballroom through private donations without congressional approval.
Assessments
The record shows the taxpayer-funding controversy remained active and that Murray publicly criticized the ballroom funding proposal, but it does not show that Murray herself called on the Government Accountability Office to investigate or request a GAO legal decision. A GAO-directed request by another senator and a separate court ruling do not satisfy the candidate-specific promise on the available evidence.