Create a federal framework for how the United States governs artificial intelligence.

Jay Obernolte · California · Republican

policy impact 0.75 specificity 0.72 extraction confidence 91%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

released a discussion draft of the Great American AI Act, bipartisan legislation to create a federal framework for how the United States governs artificial intelligence.

Obernolte released draft bipartisan legislation intended to create a federal AI governance framework.

Press Releases | Representative Jay Obernolte
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

Full Title To provide for Federal oversight of the development and deployment of frontier artificial intelligence in interstate and foreign commerce, and for other purposes.

Obernolte introduced H.R. 9925, a bill whose stated purpose is to provide federal oversight of frontier artificial intelligence development and deployment.

H.R. 9925 (IH) - Frontier Risk Oversight, National Transparency, Independent Evaluation, and Reporting Act - BILLS-119hr9925ih | Content Details | GovInfo
primary · other · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Obernolte and Trahan released a discussion draft of the Great American AI Act, described as bipartisan legislation to create a federal framework for U.S. AI governance. The release says the draft is for public feedback before formal introduction.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official House release shows Obernolte took concrete action toward the promise, but the measure was only a discussion draft, not enacted or formally introduced legislation.

partial same_term A for effort

Obernolte, Trahan release a discussion draft of the Great American AI Act | Representative Jay Obernolte
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The draft is marked DISCUSSION DRAFT, 119th Congress, H.R. __, and names Mr. Obernolte and Mrs. Trahan as sponsors. Its table of contents includes frontier AI governance, transparency, audits, whistleblower protections, federalization of state AI model-development laws, AI fraud deterrence, workforce, cybersecurity, and AI R&D provisions.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The draft text is broad enough to constitute a proposed federal AI governance framework, but its placeholder bill number and discussion-draft status show it was not yet enacted.

partial same_term A for effort

the-great-american-ai-act-discussion-draft-website-compressed-compressed.pdf
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Axios reported within the lookback window that Trahan co-authored the Great American Artificial Intelligence Act with Jay Obernolte, a 269-page discussion draft that would freeze state AI development regulation for three years, and that more than 200 state legislators demanded removal of the preemption language.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Latest-window reporting confirms the Obernolte-Trahan framework remained a contested draft and had not resolved the federal AI framework question.

partial same_term A for effort

Trahan faces progressive pushback over federal AI regulation plan
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 87%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The White House said it issued a comprehensive national legislative framework addressing key AI policy objectives and looked forward to working with Congress to turn the framework into legislation the President can sign.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The executive branch produced legislative recommendations for a national AI framework, but the release itself frames enactment as future congressional work, not completed delivery by Obernolte.

partial same_term

President Donald J. Trump Unveils National AI Legislative Framework
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The White House framework says the federal government must establish a federal AI policy framework, recommends congressional preemption of burdensome state AI laws, and sets out recommendations on children, communities, IP, free speech, innovation, workforce, and state-law preemption.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This is a federal policy framework document, but it is a set of recommendations to Congress rather than enacted law or an Obernolte-authored statutory framework.

partial same_term

National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence: Legislative Recommendations
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

AP reported that a proposed 10-year ban on state AI regulation was stripped from the tax-and-spending bill in a 99-1 Senate vote, and that many conservatives argued comprehensive federal legislation was needed but should not override state authority.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): A prior federal preemption attempt failed, showing that a binding federal AI governance framework had not been delivered through that legislative vehicle.

unresolved same_term A for effort

How a GOP rift over tech regulation doomed a ban on state AI laws in Trump's tax bill
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): never. unknown A for effort

Obernolte materially advanced the promise in federal office by co-authoring and releasing the Great American AI Act discussion draft, which was broad enough to propose a federal AI governance framework. But the evidence shows it remained a discussion draft for feedback, with no enacted federal framework or formally delivered statutory regime. The White House framework was also only legislative recommendations, and a related federal preemption effort failed. Because there was serious legislative effort but the promised outcome was not delivered, this is not fulfilled.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%