The Members close by urging HHS to strike the proposed rule, and instead work to strengthen Head Start: “Proposed rule (RIN 0970-AD21) does nothing to support working women, families, childcare workers, or early childhood education teachers. Rather, it will worsen our country’s failing childcare infrastructure, push women out of the workforce, and cost our economy billions. We remain committed to building an affordable future for all women and families, where childcare is not financially detrimental. That is why we strongly oppose proposed rule (RIN) 0970-AD20 and demand your Department prioritize funding for Head Start.”
Oppose HHS rules that would weaken Head Start worker wages and benefits, and press HHS to withdraw those rules and prioritize funding to strengthen Head Start.
Occurrences
Evidence
AP reported that Head Start teachers earn about $39,000 on average, far below comparable public school teachers; the Biden administration wanted higher pay, but Congress had no plan to expand the Head Start budget, creating a tradeoff between pay increases and child slots.
HHS announced a proposed rule to strengthen the Head Start workforce, increase wages, and support quality programming.
AP reported that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told Congress the administration would not cut Head Start funding after concerns about layoffs, funding freezes, regional office closures, and a leaked proposal to defund the program.
The Washington Post reported GAO found the Trump administration violated the Impoundment Control Act by improperly withholding more than $825 million in Head Start funds from January 20 to April 15, 2025.
The 2026 federal budget article summarizes that H.R. 7148, covering Defense, Transportation-HUD, and Health and Human Services, Labor, and Education, passed the House on January 22, 2026 and later passed the Senate on January 30, 2026.
Assessments
The evidence establishes a live Head Start workforce funding and wage issue, including Biden-era rulemaking to strengthen wages and later threats or funding disruptions, but it does not show Julia Brownley personally opposing a specific HHS weakening rule, pressing HHS to withdraw it, or materially securing stronger Head Start funding. Because the promised oversight action and the policy result are not documented in the supplied record, fulfillment cannot be confirmed.