We will continue to seek a path forward that remedies this bill’s flaws, and we remain ready to negotiate expeditiously with Congressional colleagues to achieve our common objectives.
Seek a path forward to revise the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2026 so its flaws are remedied before it is sent to the president, and negotiate expeditiously with congressional colleagues toward that goal.
Occurrences
I reaffirmed my willingness to work swiftly and across the aisle on reaching a good-faith compromise that helps the Ukrainian people and holds Russia accountable. The time to negotiate a solution is now.
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
After Senate passage, Beyer and Gregory W. Meeks said their concerns had not been addressed, the current text was unacceptable, and continued refinement was imperative before the bill could be sent to the president.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Meeks objected to the Senate bill's tariff powers and said he remained open to a good-faith compromise built on the bipartisan Ukraine Support Act that passed the House in June.
Assessments
As of the latest evidence on August 7, 2026, Meeks had publicly objected to the Senate-passed Sanctioning Russia Act text and said he would continue seeking a negotiated revision before it reached the president. That shows an active position and intent to negotiate, but the record does not show that the bill was actually revised, remedied, or sent forward in corrected form. Because the matter was still pending during his current federal House term, the promise remains unresolved rather than delivered or failed.