The Frontier Risk Oversight, National Transparency, Independent Evaluation, and Reporting (FRONTIER) Act, H.R. 9925, would create a risk-based system with oversight requirements that vary based on the size of AI developers... Rep. Franklin... said... "It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators driving America’s AI ecosystem."
Scott Franklin will support a national, risk-based framework for regulating advanced frontier AI models that focuses oversight on the largest developers while avoiding one-size-fits-all mandates on startups and smaller innovators.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
H.R. 9925 was introduced July 23, 2026 by Obernolte for himself, Trahan, Houchin, Peters, Scott Franklin of Florida, and Subramanyam. The bill provides federal oversight of frontier AI and defines large and very large frontier developers by revenue and AI-related development expenditures.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Franklin's office said the FRONTIER Act would create a risk-based system with oversight requirements varying by developer size, focused on the largest developers and avoiding one-size-fits-all mandates on startups and smaller innovators.
Assessments
Franklin fulfilled the promise to support, rather than necessarily enact, a national risk-based frontier AI framework. During his current federal House term, he joined H.R. 9925, the FRONTIER Act, as an original cosponsor and publicly promoted it as targeted oversight for the largest frontier AI developers while avoiding uniform mandates on startups and smaller innovators. The bill remained in committee as of the available record, so this is not evidence of enacted regulation, but the promise was framed as support for such a framework and his legislative action directly matched that commitment.