Ensure artificial intelligence is only used in a supporting role in health insurance claims, require licensed health care professionals to make medical-necessity denials, and disclose when AI is used in the review process.

Greg Landsman · Ohio · Democratic

policy impact 0.72 specificity 0.86 extraction confidence 82%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

The Doctor’s Not AI Act would: 1. Ensure AI is only used in a Supporting Role... Requires that denials based on medical necessity be made by a licensed health care professional with appropriate expertise... 3. Increase Transparency Requires disclosure when AI is used in the review process...

Landsman's office said the bipartisan Doctors Not AI Act would prevent AI from making medical judgment determinations, require clinician review of medical-necessity denials, and give patients transparency when AI is involved.

Landsman Introduces Bipartisan Legislation to Keep AI from Making Health Care Decisions
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

GovInfo lists H.R. 10210 as the Doctors Not AI Act of 2026, sponsored by Greg Landsman, with last action on September 1, 2026: introduced and referred to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Landsman introduced federal legislation addressing AI use in health insurance claim review, but the official status is only introduction and committee referral, not enactment or final implementation.

unresolved same_term A for effort

H.R. 10210 (IH) - Doctors Not AI Act of 2026 - BILLS-119hr10210ih | Content Details | GovInfo
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The introduced bill would require adverse benefit determinations involving clinical judgment to not be issued or dictated by AI, to be made only by a licensed health care professional, and to disclose when an AI system was used in the determination notice and administrative record.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The bill text closely matches the commitment's substance: AI only in a supporting role, licensed professional review for medical-necessity-type denials, and disclosure/documentation of AI use. Because it remains an introduced bill, the promise is not yet delivered.

unresolved same_term A for effort

GovInfo Bill Text: H.R. 10210 Introduced in House
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): unresolved. same_term A for effort

Landsman sponsored H.R. 10210, the Doctors Not AI Act of 2026, which closely matches the promise by limiting AI to a supporting role in health insurance claim review, requiring licensed health care professional judgment for adverse determinations, and mandating disclosure of AI use. However, as of September 5, 2026, the bill had only been introduced and referred to committees, with no enactment or implementation. Because he remains in office and the legislative effort is pending, the promise is not yet delivered but is not finally failed.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%