Prohibit DHS immigration enforcement personnel, including ICE, Homeland Security Investigations, and enlisted state and local officers, from using electric shock gloves during immigration enforcement.

Madeleine Dean · Pennsylvania · Democratic

policy impact 0.63 specificity 0.92 extraction confidence 86%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

verified · Source version 50074 · locator 3157

The No Shock Act would prohibit the use of these gloves for all DHS immigration enforcement, including ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), as well as state and local officers enlisted to carry out federal immigration enforcement.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Dean announced the No Shock Act, matching the commitment’s scope across ICE, HSI, and state/local officers used for federal immigration enforcement.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Reps. Dean, Ramirez Introduce Bill to Ban ICE Use of “Shock Gloves” | Press Releases | Congresswoman Madeleine Dean
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 58826 · locator unknown

The Secretary of Homeland Security shall prohibit the use of shock gloves by any Federal law enforcement officer enforcing the immigration laws.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The bill text would require DHS to prohibit shock-glove use by federal immigration-enforcement officers.

unresolved same_term A for effort

1AF434DCED5ED391B477DC23C9A66068F7920BE8C35D7B9E3ED43D7C7FC9F0CE.dean-no-shock-act.pdf
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 58826 · locator unknown

shall apply to any law enforcement officer enforcing the immigration laws pursuant to section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The bill text extends the prohibition to state and local officers acting under 287(g) immigration-enforcement authority.

unresolved same_term A for effort

1AF434DCED5ED391B477DC23C9A66068F7920BE8C35D7B9E3ED43D7C7FC9F0CE.dean-no-shock-act.pdf
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 58828 · locator 547

Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · Sep 2, 2026

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): The bill had only been referred to committee, with no enactment or final passage shown.

unresolved same_term

H.R. 10226 — To prohibit the use of shock gloves by Federal law… | Vote Files
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 58830 · locator unknown

Award Number 70CMSW26C00000012; Award Date 08/26/2026; Description See attached Justification and Approval document for full details

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The federal procurement record shows ICE proceeded with an award for the G.L.O.V.E. procurement during the lookback window, indicating the requested prohibition was not yet in force.

unresolved same_term

SAM.gov
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 58832 · locator unknown

We request that ICE provide written responses to the questions above and produce the requested documents no later than September 10, 2026.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Senators sought answers and urged ICE not to deploy the gloves, but this was oversight pressure rather than an enacted prohibition.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Van Hollen Joins Cortez Masto, Colleagues in Opposing ICE Rollout of Electric Shock Gloves
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 82%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

No assessments yet.