Prohibit DHS immigration enforcement personnel, including ICE, Homeland Security Investigations, and enlisted state and local officers, from using electric shock gloves during immigration enforcement.
Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.
Occurrences
“My bill will prohibit these devices from being used in any immigration enforcement.”
Dean said her No Shock Act would ban the use of electric shock gloves in immigration enforcement, including by ICE and related DHS enforcement personnel.
The No Shock Act would prohibit the use of these gloves for all DHS immigration enforcement, including ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), as well as state and local officers enlisted to carry out federal immigration enforcement.
Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Dean announced the No Shock Act, matching the commitment’s scope across ICE, HSI, and state/local officers used for federal immigration enforcement.
unverified · Source version 58826 · locator unknown
The Secretary of Homeland Security shall prohibit the use of shock gloves by any Federal law enforcement officer enforcing the immigration laws.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The bill text would require DHS to prohibit shock-glove use by federal immigration-enforcement officers.
unverified · Source version 58826 · locator unknown
shall apply to any law enforcement officer enforcing the immigration laws pursuant to section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The bill text extends the prohibition to state and local officers acting under 287(g) immigration-enforcement authority.
unverified · Source version 58830 · locator unknown
Award Number 70CMSW26C00000012; Award Date 08/26/2026; Description See attached Justification and Approval document for full details
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The federal procurement record shows ICE proceeded with an award for the G.L.O.V.E. procurement during the lookback window, indicating the requested prohibition was not yet in force.
unresolvedsame_term
SAM.gov
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%
unverified · Source version 58832 · locator unknown
We request that ICE provide written responses to the questions above and produce the requested documents no later than September 10, 2026.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Senators sought answers and urged ICE not to deploy the gloves, but this was oversight pressure rather than an enacted prohibition.