I am committed to opposing all legislation that weakens these long-standing bipartisan provisions.
Oppose any legislation that weakens the Hyde Amendment or similar provisions that block federal funds from being used for abortions.
Occurrences
Evidence
"The Hyde Amendment – a provision that blocks federal funds from being used for abortions – and other similar provisions are under attack ... I am committed to opposing all legislation that weakens these long-standing bipartisan provisions."
"Congressman Andrew Clyde (GA-09) and 88 original cosponsors reintroduced the Protect the UNBORN ... Act to prohibit the implementation of and funding for President Biden’s pro-abortion executive orders."
"Congressman Andrew Clyde (GA-09) led 20 of his House Republican colleagues in sending a letter to Senate Republicans to express support for Senator Tommy Tuberville’s (R-AL) hold on Department of Defense (DOD) nominations until the Department rescinds its policy to facilitate taxpayer-funded abortions."
Roll Call 436, H.R. 4365, recorded a vote on Clyde of Georgia Part A Amendment No. 155; the amendment failed 172-261 and Clyde voted with the amendment’s supporters. The clerk’s record shows Clyde offered the amendment and the House rejected it.
Assessments
The promise is a federal legislative conduct pledge: oppose legislation weakening Hyde Amendment or similar abortion funding restrictions. The evidence shows Clyde publicly maintained the position while in office and took same-term actions consistent with it, including introducing or backing measures to block abortion-related federal funding policies, offering an amendment, and organizing support against DOD abortion travel policy. However, the record provided does not establish that he opposed every relevant piece of legislation or that a promised statutory outcome was enacted. This supports partial credit with a clear effort badge rather than full delivery.
Clyde made the pledge and the evidence shows same-term conduct consistent with it: he introduced or supported measures to preserve or expand Hyde-type abortion funding restrictions, opposed executive policies he characterized as taxpayer-funded abortion facilitation, and used the legislative process to advance related restrictions. The record provided does not show enactment of a broad policy change, but the promise was framed as an opposition commitment rather than a pledge to enact a specific bill, so documented opposition and legislative action are sufficient to count as fulfilled.