I will support legislation requiring challengers to participate in the environmental review process before litigating DOE-coordinated transmission projects.

Gabe Evans · Colorado · Republican

policy impact 0.60 specificity 0.86 extraction confidence 76%

Commitment kind: action. Promised action: Support a pre-litigation environmental review participation requirement for petitioners challenging covered transmission projects.. Promised outcome: Improve upfront engagement and reduce back-end litigation delays.. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired. Official U.S. House press release announcing Evans's introduction of the CLEAR Act of 2026.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

A requirement that petitioners participate in the environmental review process before litigating, improving upfront engagement and making projects better during the review process, instead of on the back end;

The press release says the CLEAR Act would require petitioners to participate in environmental review before bringing litigation.

Evans, Peters Unveil Bill to Address Transmission Project Bottlenecks and Lower Electricity Costs | Representative Gabe Evans
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

verified · Source version 65841 · locator 1343

Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Evans of Colorado) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Official GovInfo metadata shows Evans was included at introduction on H.R. 10302 and that the bill was referred to committee, not enacted.

unresolved same_term A for effort

H.R. 10302 (IH) - Certainty in Litigation for Electric Asset Reliability (CLEAR) Act of 2026 - BILLS-119hr10302ih | Content Details | GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 99%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 52836 · locator 2707

a person may obtain rehearing and judicial review of such an approval only under such section 313.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): The introduced bill text applies Federal Power Act section 313 review to coordinated transmission-facility federal authorizations, matching the promised litigation-channel mechanism but still only as introduced legislation.

unresolved same_term A for effort

H.R. 10302 Introduced Text - CLEAR Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 52829 · locator 3867

A requirement that petitioners participate in the environmental review process before litigating, improving upfront engagement and making projects better during the review process

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Evans's official office described the CLEAR Act as containing the exact participation-before-litigation requirement named in the promise.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Evans, Peters Unveil Bill to Address Transmission Project Bottlenecks and Lower Electricity Costs | Representative Gabe Evans
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 52848 · locator 2473

No proceeding to review any order of the Commission shall be brought by any entity unless such entity shall have made application

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): The underlying Federal Power Act section 313 framework requires a rehearing application before judicial review, supporting why H.R. 10302 would require earlier participation before litigation.

unresolved unknown

16 USC 825l: Review of orders
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 52850 · locator 10902

If you do not intervene, you will not be able to apply to the Commission for rehearing

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): FERC guidance explains the practical participation prerequisite tied to rehearing and court review, reinforcing the bill's intended pathway for challengers.

unresolved unknown

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Rehearing Requests | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · unverified · Source revision or retrieval eligibility changed; current packet requires reassessment.. Original AI recommendation (not independently established): unresolved. unknown

provider integrity · model deterministic · confidence 0%

Public state: delivered As of 2026-09-14 · verified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): delivered. same_term A for effort

The commitment was to support legislation containing a pre-litigation environmental review participation requirement, not necessarily to enact it. Verified evidence shows the CLEAR Act included that requirement and that Evans was named on the introduced bill with Peters, which was referred to committee. Because Evans materially supported and advanced the legislation in the same term, the action promise is delivered, while enactment of the broader policy outcome remains unproven.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%