A requirement that petitioners participate in the environmental review process before litigating, improving upfront engagement and making projects better during the review process, instead of on the back end;
I will support legislation requiring challengers to participate in the environmental review process before litigating DOE-coordinated transmission projects.
Occurrences
Evidence
verified · Source version 65841 · locator 1343
Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Evans of Colorado) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
verified · Source version 52836 · locator 2707
a person may obtain rehearing and judicial review of such an approval only under such section 313.
verified · Source version 52829 · locator 3867
A requirement that petitioners participate in the environmental review process before litigating, improving upfront engagement and making projects better during the review process
verified · Source version 52848 · locator 2473
No proceeding to review any order of the Commission shall be brought by any entity unless such entity shall have made application
verified · Source version 52850 · locator 10902
If you do not intervene, you will not be able to apply to the Commission for rehearing
Assessments
The commitment was to support legislation containing a pre-litigation environmental review participation requirement, not necessarily to enact it. Verified evidence shows the CLEAR Act included that requirement and that Evans was named on the introduced bill with Peters, which was referred to committee. Because Evans materially supported and advanced the legislation in the same term, the action promise is delivered, while enactment of the broader policy outcome remains unproven.