Make sanctuary jurisdictions ineligible for grant funds administered by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for use in those jurisdictions.

Barry Loudermilk · Georgia · Republican

spending impact 0.62 specificity 0.90 extraction confidence 82%

Commitment kind: outcome. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: Sanctuary jurisdictions would be ineligible for HUD-administered grant funds for use in those jurisdictions.. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired. Cosponsor of H.R. 10222, the No HUD Funding for Sanctuary Cities Act, introduced in the 119th Congress on 2026-09-02.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Mr. Downing (for himself, Mr. Davidson, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. McCormick, Mr. Perry, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Ms. Hageman, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Cline, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Brecheen, Mrs. Biggs of South Carolina, Mr. Harris of Maryland, Mr. Babin, Mr. Rulli, Mr. Self, and Mr. Moore of North Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services Bill Number H.R. 10222 Bill Version Introduced in House (IH) Short Title No HUD Funding for Sanctuary Cities Act Full Title To establish that sanctuary jurisdictions are not eligible for any grant funds administered by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for use in such jurisdiction, and for other purposes.

Loudermilk was listed as a cosponsor of H.R. 10222, a bill to make sanctuary jurisdictions ineligible for HUD-administered grant funds used in those jurisdictions.

H.R. 10222 (IH) - No HUD Funding for Sanctuary Cities Act - BILLS-119hr10222ih | Related Documents | GovInfo
primary · other · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

verified · Source version 54280 · locator 482

Mr. Downing (for himself, Mr. Davidson, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Loudermilk,

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Official GPO bill text shows Loudermilk as an initial cosponsor of H.R. 10222, a bill matching the commitment; the same bill text identifies it as introduced in the House and referred to Financial Services, so it is concrete effort but not enacted delivery.

unresolved same_term A for effort

H.R. 10222 (IH) - No HUD Funding for Sanctuary Cities Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 54282 · locator unknown

condition 7 is enjoined and HUD may not deny plaintiffs federal funding

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): A federal district court order blocked HUD from using an executive-order-based condition to deny certain plaintiffs HUD CoC and CDBG funding tied to sanctuary-jurisdiction policy, indicating administrative attempts were blocked rather than fully delivering the commitment.

unresolved same_term

City and County of San Francisco et al v. Donald J. Trump et al, Document 225
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 82%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: pending As of 2026-09-15 · verified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): unresolved. unknown A for effort

The verified commitment is an outcome promise: sanctuary jurisdictions would be made ineligible for HUD-administered grant funds. The verified bill text shows Loudermilk was an original cosponsor of H.R. 10222, matching the proposed policy and documenting material effort. However, the verified evidence only establishes bill introduction/referral, not enactment or implementation of the funding restriction. With no documented deadline expired as of 2026-09-15, an introduced bill does not fulfill the promised outcome.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%