Establish a comprehensive government approach to place guardrails on artificial intelligence and limit competitors’ and adversaries’ ability to develop dangerous technologies.

The warnings we’ve gotten after multiple concerning AI incidents need to serve as a wake-up call to establish a comprehensive approach including government action to put guardrails on our own technology, and ensure that our competitors and adversaries aren’t able to develop dangerous technologies.

Kim called for a comprehensive government approach to AI guardrails and preventing competitors and adversaries from developing dangerous technologies.

Senator Kim Calls on Senate to Reassert Control over AI - Senator Andy Kim
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

verified · Source version 62967 · locator 857

“The warnings we’ve gotten after multiple concerning AI incidents need to serve as a wake-up call to establish a comprehensive approach including government action to put guardrails on our own technology, and ensure that our competitors and adversaries aren’t able to develop dangerous technologies.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): In the lookback window, Kim said the comprehensive AI guardrails/adversary-control approach still needed action and named pending bipartisan bills as next steps.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Senator Kim Calls on Senate to Reassert Control over AI - Senator Andy Kim
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

verified · Source version 62989 · locator 1316

Mr. Hagerty (for himself, Mr. Kim, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, and Ms. Cortez Masto) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): GovInfo shows Kim as an original cosponsor of the BLADE Act, but the listed action is introduction and referral, not enactment.

unresolved same_term A for effort

S. 5252 (IS) - Blocking Large-scale Adversarial Distillation Efforts Act of 2026 - BILLS-119s5252is | Content Details | GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

unverified · Source version 62991 · locator unknown

The United States Government, in cooperation with private owners of closed-source artificial intelligence models, should take steps to identify, punish, and deter model extraction attacks on the protected capabilities of closed-source artificial intelligence models by persons of concern;

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The bill text targets adversarial extraction of U.S. AI models, matching the adversary-technology portion of the commitment, but remains an introduced bill.

unresolved same_term A for effort

BLADE Act introduced text
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

verified · Source version 62975 · locator 1324

Mr. Ricketts (for himself, Mr. Kim, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): GovInfo confirms Kim co-introduced/cosponsored the MATCH Act, but it was only referred to committee.

unresolved same_term A for effort

S. 4281 (IS) - Multilateral Alignment of Technology Controls on Hardware (MATCH) Act - BILLS-119s4281is | Content Details | GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

verified · Source version 62993 · locator 2911

the United States Government should work closely with allies and partners of the United States to align export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components to prevent gaps in controls, reduce the risk of circumvention, and ensure a level global playing field;

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): The MATCH Act text proposes multilateral export-control alignment to restrict adversaries’ chipmaking capabilities, a concrete effort toward the promise but not a completed result.

unresolved same_term A for effort

MATCH Act introduced text
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

verified · Source version 62983 · locator 9366

Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models, including frontier models.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): A 2026 executive order created some AI security coordination, but expressly avoided mandatory model licensing or preclearance, leaving Kim’s broader guardrails commitment unresolved.

partial same_term

Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security – The White House
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 82%