The Cruz-Wyden bill would provide a private right of action for the coercive governmental threat itself when that threat is made against a broadcaster, social media, or similar kind of tech company. And it would ensure that the public has needed visibility into the instances where the government directs platforms to take specific content actions. As Ranking Member Cantwell has said on this issue, transparency is a ‘good antiseptic.’ I urge my colleagues to support this bipartisan proposal.
Support the JAWBONE Act to create a private right of action against coercive government threats to broadcasters, social media platforms, or similar technology companies and require public visibility when the government directs platforms to take specific content actions.
Occurrences
Evidence
unverified · Source version 63951 · locator unknown
S. 4749, JAWBONE Act as amended by the Cruz substitute. 18 Yeas, 10 Nays
unverified · Source version 63951 · locator unknown
Yeas: Chairman Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Senators John Thune (R-S.D.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.)
verified · Source version 63951 · locator 7627
The Cruz-Wyden bill would provide a private right of action for the coercive governmental threat itself
verified · Source version 63951 · locator 7839
ensure that the public has needed visibility into the instances where the government directs platforms to take specific content actions
unverified · Source version 63953 · locator unknown
Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred
unverified · Source version 63955 · locator unknown
Although the Cantwell substitute amendment was not agreed to, Chair Cruz agreed to work with Sen. Cantwell to address her concerns.
Assessments
The verified commitment was to support and urge colleagues to support the bipartisan Cruz-Wyden JAWBONE proposal, not a promise that the bill would be enacted by a deadline. The verified original commitment itself states Cruz urged colleagues to support the proposal, and verified passages show the proposal contained the promised private-right-of-action and public-visibility provisions. Because the bill is described as the Cruz-Wyden bill, the candidate attribution is material. There is no verified evidence here proving enactment of the underlying statutory outcome, so this delivery applies to the support/urge action, not enactment.