“My team and I are looking into the legality of this interpretation. This administration has its own unique way of interpreting the law. California already sends the federal government more than $80 billion a year in federal taxes than we get back. Clearly, this administration wants more from us,” Correa concluded .
Look into the legality of the Department of Justice interpretation requiring state agencies that receive certain federal funding to report immigration status information to DHS.
Occurrences
Evidence
unverified · Source version 65057 · locator unknown
“My team and I are looking into the legality of this interpretation. This administration has its own unique way of interpreting the law. California already sends the federal government more than $80 billion a year in federal taxes than we get back. Clearly, this administration wants more from us,” Correa concluded.
verified · Source version 65061 · locator 4476
The opinion applies prospectively. States will not face retroactive penalties for past reliance on the 1998 interpretation. Federal agencies may rely on OLC’s advice to update TANF and SSI grant agreements and compliance processes to reflect the correct legal standard moving forward.
Assessments
The verified commitment says Correa and his team were looking into the legality of the DOJ interpretation, which supports an effort badge. However, the only verified passage in the evidence establishes the DOJ opinion and prospective implementation context, not that Correa completed a legal review, issued findings, filed or advanced oversight, or otherwise delivered the promised action. With no deadline and no verified completion evidence as of 2026-09-23, the outcome remains unresolved.