what I support, what I've always supported, is Roe v. Wade, restoring Roe v. Wade into federal law
Restore Roe v. Wade in federal law.
Occurrences
I would support going back to the law in Iowa that we had before all of this started
What I support, what I've always supported is Roe versus Wade, restoring Roe versus Wade into federal law.
Evidence
GovInfo shows H.R. 12, the Women's Health Protection Act of 2023, was introduced on March 30, 2023 and referred to committee; the record shows introduction and referral, not enactment.
GovInfo lists Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks among the cosponsors of H.R. 431, the Life at Conception Act, introduced January 20, 2023. The bill states it would define legal protection from conception, not restore Roe v. Wade.
The House Clerk roll call for H.R. 26 shows Mariannette Miller-Meeks voted Yea on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act on January 11, 2023.
Assessments
The promised federal outcome, restoring Roe v. Wade in federal law, was not enacted during the relevant federal term. H.R. 12, the Women's Health Protection Act of 2023, was introduced and referred to committee but did not become law. The candidate is instead documented as cosponsoring the Life at Conception Act and voting for the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, actions inconsistent with materially advancing restoration of Roe. Because there is no serious legislative or executive attempt by the candidate toward the promised outcome, no effort badge is warranted.
The promised outcome, restoring Roe v. Wade in federal law, was not delivered. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2023 was introduced and referred to committee but not enacted. The cited record for Mariannette Miller-Meeks shows actions inconsistent with the promise, including cosponsoring the Life at Conception Act and voting for H.R. 26, rather than a serious attempt to codify Roe.