Commitment kind: action. Promised action: Work with global partners to develop fundamental guardrails for AI safety.. Promised outcome: Safety of AI as the technology develops.. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired. Press availability as House Democratic Whip discussing AI safety and legislative concerns.
Occurrences
That should be a top priority that we are working on right now. And so that we can continue and work with global partners who are also developing this technology together on some fundamental guardrails to ensure safety of AI as we move forward.
Clark said AI safety should be a top priority and committed to working with global partners on fundamental guardrails for AI safety.
We want to be the leaders in this technology, but we want it to benefit the American people. We want to protect jobs, and protect our kids, and develop a way to harness AI for good, and protect the American people from harm.
Clark said Democrats want AI leadership that benefits Americans while protecting jobs, children, and the public from harm.
unverified · Source version 91461 · locator unknown
“work with global partners who are also developing this technology together on some fundamental guardrails to ensure safety of AI”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): In the lookback window, Clark publicly called AI safety a global issue and said Democrats would push for guardrails with global partners. This is concrete advocacy, not enactment.
unverified · Source version 68159 · locator unknown
“discuss necessary guardrails and global standards for the development, testing, and use of AI”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): A contemporaneous congressional letter shows the global-partner guardrails objective remained at the urging/negotiation stage near the as-of date, rather than a completed agreement.
unverified · Source version 68161 · locator unknown
“Clark (MA) | Democratic | MA | Yea”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Clark voted for the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a concrete House vote on an AI-related safety guardrail addressing deepfake abuse.
unverified · Source version 68163 · locator unknown
“created through the use of software, machine learning, artificial intelligence”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The enacted TAKE IT DOWN Act created federal guardrails for nonconsensual intimate digital forgeries, including AI-generated depictions. This delivers a narrow AI safety component, not the broader global-partner guardrails claim.
unverified · Source version 68165 · locator unknown
“Clark (MA) | Democratic | MA | Yea”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Clark voted for House passage of the KIDS Act, which included AI chatbot provisions for minors. Because House passage alone is not enactment, this is evidence of effort toward guardrails.
unverified · Source version 68167 · locator unknown
“AI WARNINGS AND RESOURCES FOR EDUCATION (AWARE) ACT”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The House-engrossed KIDS Act contained an AI-warning component, relevant to child-safety guardrails, but available records do not show enactment by the as-of date.
unverified · Source version 91466 · locator unknown
“Meanwhile, Mike Johnson’s response was to send us home early, rather than tackling this very key issue that Americans are worried about.”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Clark’s office posted a new statement continuing to press for AI guardrails and saying House Republican leadership had not acted, which is concrete advocacy and obstruction/unresolved status rather than delivery.
unverified · Source version 79863 · locator unknown
“Ms. Slotkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The official GovInfo bill record for the AI Guardrails Act of 2026 still shows only introduction and committee referral, so this federal guardrails effort had not been enacted by the as-of date.
unverified · Source version 91466 · locator unknown
“Again, we want to be the leaders in this. But there are ways as we are working with experts and we should be here working on these solutions to answer what the companies say they want: outside regulation, outside audits of what they’re doing.”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Clark continued pressing during the lookback window for AI guardrails such as outside regulation and outside audits, showing active advocacy but not completed federal enactment.
unverified · Source version 91468 · locator unknown
“The two countries established the U.S.-China Super Intelligence (SI) Dialogue to exchange views on risks and benefits related to SI. The next exchange will occur by November 2026.”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The White House announced a U.S.-China dialogue on AI/SI risks and benefits, a concrete global-partner step. Because it is a dialogue/channel rather than enacted guardrails or binding standards, it supports partial delivery only.
unverified · Source version 91470 · locator unknown
“China and the U.S. also agree to establish a bilateral communication channel for AI incidents.”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): China’s foreign ministry independently confirmed the U.S.-China AI incident communication channel, reinforcing partial progress on international AI safety cooperation but not proving broad guardrails.
unverified · Source version 91472 · locator unknown
“As of now, though, I object.”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The Senate record shows Sen. Cruz objected to unanimous-consent passage of the Artificial Intelligence Risk Management and Security Act, leaving that guardrails bill unresolved despite a concrete attempt.
unverified · Source version 91474 · locator unknown
“introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): GovInfo records S.5576 as introduced and referred, not enacted, so this federal AI safety-board and risk-management effort remained pending as of the lookback period.
unverified · Source version 91476 · locator unknown
“The Secretary, in coordination with and subject to the agreement of the Secretary of State, shall undertake negotiations with foreign partners”
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The bill text includes a foreign-partner component for AI safety and security cooperation, matching the global-partner part of the promise, but the measure was only introduced and not enacted.