WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Representatives Suhas Subramanyam (VA-10) and Jefferson Shreve (IN-06) introduced the Stop Spam Calls Act to crack down on spam calls and texts by empowering the FCC to better protect consumers. The bill requires each telemarketer wanting to send robocalls or robotexts to a consumer to directly get their explicit, written consent. Under current law, businesses can ask consumers to consent to telemarketing calls from them and thousands of their marketing partners with a single check box. “Families shouldn’t be subjected to unwanted telemarketing robocalls from thousands of businesses. In an age where Americans have become far too used to their information being sold to the highest bidder behind their backs, Congress needs to take action to protect people’s privacy. The Stop Spam Calls Act will reign in robocall abuses and reestablish the power of consent for consumers,” said Congressman Subramanyam.
Require telemarketers to obtain explicit written consent from each consumer before sending robocalls or robotexts, in order to curb robocall abuses and restore consumer control over consent.
Occurrences
Evidence
unverified · Source version 73107 · locator unknown
"U.S. Representatives Suhas Subramanyam (VA-10) and Jefferson Shreve (IN-06) introduced the Stop Spam Calls Act to crack down on spam calls and texts by empowering the FCC to better protect consumers."
unverified · Source version 73107 · locator unknown
"The bill requires each telemarketer wanting to send robocalls or robotexts to a consumer to directly get their explicit, written consent."
unverified · Source version 73109 · locator unknown
"The Commission closes the lead generator loophole by requiring comparison shopping websites to get consumer consent one seller at a time, if prior express written consent is required under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), and thus prohibits abuse of consumer consent by such websites."
unverified · Source version 73111 · locator unknown
"This action reinstates in the Commission's rules the prior version of Sec. 64.1200(f)(9). Prior to the court's mandate, the Commission had postponed the effective date of the revised rule and the revised rule had not gone into effect."
unverified · Source version 73113 · locator unknown
"For these reasons, we grant IMC’s petition for review, vacate Part III.D of the 2023 Order, and remand for further proceedings."
unverified · Source version 85115 · locator unknown
"Last Action Date Listed September 24, 2026 Action Mr. Subramanyam (for himself, Mr. Shreve, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Carson, Mr. Whitesides, and Mr. Mannion) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce"
unverified · Source version 85117 · locator unknown
"Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall revise section 64.1200(f)(9) of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations"
Assessments
No assessments yet.