Will support directing the Interior Secretary to report to Congress on how the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields partnership model could be replicated at other National Park System locations.

Riley M. Moore · West Virginia · Republican

oversight impact 0.25 specificity 0.83 extraction confidence 72%

Commitment kind: action. Promised action: Support legislation directing the Secretary of the Interior to report to Congress on replicating the partnership model at other National Park System locations.. Promised outcome: Congress receives recommendations on replicating the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields partnership model elsewhere.. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired. As U.S. Representative for West Virginia's 2nd District, Moore introduced the Shenandoah VALOR Act in the 2025-2026 Congress.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

The legislation further directs the Secretary of the Interior to report to Congress on ways the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields partnership model could be replicated at other locations within the National Park System.

Moore's legislation would require the Interior Secretary to report to Congress on replicating the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields partnership model elsewhere in the National Park System.

Congressman Riley M. Moore Introduces Bipartisan Shenandoah VALOR Act to Expand Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District into West Virginia | Representative Riley Moore
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

unverified · Source version 73310 · locator unknown

"joined Congressman Riley M. Moore (WV-02) to introduce"; "directs the Secretary of the Interior to report to Congress"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official House press release describes Moore's role introducing the Shenandoah VALOR Act and states the bill would direct an Interior Secretary report to Congress on replication of the partnership model. This is concrete effort, not enacted delivery.

unresolved same_term A for effort

McClellan Joins Bipartisan Shenandoah VALOR Act to Expand Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District into West Virginia | Congresswoman Jennifer McClellan
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 73312 · locator unknown

"09/24/26 | H.R.10581 | To expand the boundaries of the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official House Natural Resources bill list shows H.R.10581 before the committee with a September 24, 2026 action listing, indicating the House bill remained an introduced/committee matter rather than enacted law as of the refresh.

unresolved same_term A for effort

The House Committee on Natural Resources
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 78%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 85272 · locator unknown

"Last Action Date Listed September 24, 2026"; "introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources"; "Sponsors Riley M. Moore(WV)"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): GovInfo's official bill details show Moore sponsored H.R.10581 and that the latest listed action remained introduction/referral to House Natural Resources, so the report requirement had not been enacted or delivered as of this refresh.

unresolved same_term A for effort

H.R. 10581 (IH) - Shenandoah Valley Access, Legacy, and Outdoor Recreation Act - BILLS-119hr10581ih | Content Details | GovInfo
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 84%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 94715 · locator 5887

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall submit to Congress a report

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Section 2(e) of Moore’s introduced bill expressly requires recommendations for replicating the partnership model elsewhere in the National Park System. This adds the precise proposed deadline: two years after enactment. It documents concrete legislative effort; introduction alone does not establish enactment or delivery.

unresolved same_term A for effort

H. R. 10581 (Introduced-in-House)
secondary · model gpt-6.1-sol · confidence 99%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 94717 · locator unknown

However, we do not support S. 5169, as it would divert NPS resources from higher priority operational responsibilities

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Earlier official testimony documents Interior opposition to the related Senate proposal, which includes the same partnership-model reporting requirement. The department cites competing operational priorities and resource constraints. This establishes an obstacle, but does not establish abandonment, final defeat, or reversal by Moore.

unresolved same_term

Pending Legislation | U.S. Department of the Interior
secondary · model gpt-6.1-sol · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: pending As of 2026-10-20 · verified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): unresolved. unknown A for effort

The verified commitment supports the reporting proposal, warranting effort credit. Passage 69023 specifies a report due two years after enactment but proves neither enactment nor submission to Congress. The promise is not expressly limited to introduction, no expired deadline is established, and material contribution to a completed outcome remains unverified.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-6.1-sol · confidence 95%