As you prepare for the upcoming summit, we urge you to engage with President Xi directly to discuss efforts to avoid the potential harms of this technology for the safety and benefit of the world. America leads in AI innovation, and we must lead the world in AI safety and international cooperation, including by working with China to develop a formal agreement that would slow down, and potentially enact a mutual pause in, frontier AI development to prevent cyberattacks, the development of biological weapons, and other dangerous activities that threaten the lives of the American people and humanity writ large.
Urge President Trump to engage China at the highest level and negotiate a formal U.S.-China agreement on AI safety guardrails, global standards, verification, and a potential mutual pause in frontier AI development.
Occurrences
Evidence
verified · Source version 74183 · locator 1282
led more than 15 of his colleagues in calling on President Donald Trump to negotiate a formal agreement between the U.S. and China
unverified · Source version 74186 · locator unknown
standards needed for development and testing processes, oversight and monitoring of models, enforcing human control over the use of autonomous systems, and technological verification
verified · Source version 74188 · locator 7266
established the U.S.-China Super Intelligence (SI) Dialogue to exchange views on risks and benefits related to SI
verified · Source version 74190 · locator 3652
China and the U.S. also agree to establish a bilateral communication channel for AI incidents.
verified · Source version 74192 · locator 4272
AI must be kept under human control.
verified · Source version 74194 · locator 1646
I want to leave it exactly where it is. That is China’s position also. Our guardrail is the DOJ!
Assessments
The verified commitment was an action framed as urging President Trump to engage President Xi and pursue a formal U.S.-China AI safety agreement. Verified evidence shows Van Hollen led more than 15 colleagues in calling on Trump to negotiate such an agreement, which fulfills the specific promise to urge and press the administration. The later U.S.-China AI dialogue evidence does not prove the broader formal agreement was completed or attributable to Van Hollen, but enactment of that outcome was not required to satisfy this occurrence-specific action promise.