Follow the Water Resources Development Act funding request through the process and continue working with colleagues until funds are delivered for water infrastructure projects in Danbury, New Britain, Thomaston, and Waterbury.

Jahana Hayes · Connecticut · Democratic

spending impact 0.70 specificity 0.80 extraction confidence 93%

Commitment kind: action. Promised action: Follow the Water Resources Development Act funding request through the legislative and appropriations process and continue working with colleagues.. Promised outcome: Funds delivered for water infrastructure projects in Danbury, New Britain, Thomaston, and Waterbury.. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired. Press release after Hayes voted to pass H.R. 9497, the Water Resources Development Act of 2026, which included a $50 million request for Fifth District water infrastructure projects that still required Fiscal Year 2027 federal budget approval.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

verified · Source version 77626 · locator 2613

This is only the first step, as projects still must be approved as part of the Fiscal Year 2027 Federal Budget.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Hayes' office says the WRDA request advanced through the House but still needs FY2027 budget approval, so the funding has not yet been delivered.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Hayes Votes for Water Infrastructure Projects Supporting Danbury, New Britain, Thomaston, and Waterbury | Press Releases | Congresswoman Jahana Hayes
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 77628 · locator unknown

Danbury, connecticut.--$32,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The reported WRDA text includes an authorization for Danbury; the same section also lists New Britain, Thomaston, and Waterbury authorizations totaling $50 million across the four municipalities.

unresolved same_term A for effort

House Report 119-795 - WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 77630 · locator unknown

Hayes | Democratic | CT | Yea

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The official House roll call records Hayes voting yes on H.R. 9497; the motion passed the House, but that did not itself deliver funds.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 77632 · locator unknown

H.R. 9497. An act to provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United States

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The Senate Congressional Record shows the House-passed WRDA measure appearing in the Senate record after House passage, indicating continued process but not enactment or delivered funding.

unresolved same_term A for effort

CREC-2026-09-17-pt1-PgS4795-3.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: pending As of 2026-10-02 · verified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): unresolved. unknown A for effort

The verified commitment promised continued work until funds were delivered. The only verified evidence says the projects were only at a first step and still had to be approved in the FY2027 federal budget, so delivered funding is not established as of 2026-10-02. With no documented expired deadline and no verified enactment or disbursement, the promise remains unresolved rather than delivered or never fulfilled.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%