Prohibits military personnel and federal agencies from accessing election records preserved under federal law.
Prohibit military personnel and federal agencies from accessing federally preserved election records.
Occurrences
Evidence
verified · Source version 80491 · locator 1319
the Department has no plan to deploy active-duty troops or Federalized National Guard to polling sites, nor does it have any plan to interfere with ballots, voting machines, or other election-related materials
verified · Source version 80493 · locator 7980
By Ms. HOULAHAN (for herself, Ms. Goodlander, Mr. Whitesides, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Tran, and Mr. Panetta): H.R. 10497. A bill to require explicit Congressional approval for troops or armed persons at polling places
verified · Source version 80493 · locator 8262
to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker
unverified · Source version 80479 · locator unknown
No funds may be appropriated or otherwise made available to the armed forces, as defined in section 101(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, or any Executive agency
unverified · Source version 80479 · locator unknown
for the purpose of authorizing or ordering any troops or armed persons under the authority or control of such entity to access any record or paper required under subsection (a) to be retained and preserved
unverified · Source version 80477 · locator unknown
Representatives Chrissy Houlahan (PA-06), Maggie Goodlander (NH-02), George Whitesides (CA-27), and Pat Ryan (NY-18) introduced the Protect Our Polls Act
Assessments
The verified commitment promised an outcome: prohibiting military personnel and federal agencies from accessing federally preserved election records. Verified evidence shows Goodlander was included on H.R. 10497 and that the bill was referred to committees, which documents material legislative effort in the same term. However, the verified passages do not show enactment or any binding prohibition. The Defense Department statement only says there was no current plan to deploy troops or interfere with election materials, not that the promised legal prohibition was achieved.