Pallone writes that while he supports these goals, FERC should impose the following improvements to strengthen them: Ensure that data centers are responsible for all the costs they cause, not just for new power plants designed to shore up reliability; Make the requirement for data centers to bring their own new generation capacity online permanent; and Make the proposed data center registry public so that every American has access to the information they need to protect and empower their communities.
Supports making requirements for data centers to bring their own new generation capacity online permanent.
Occurrences
Evidence
verified · Source version 80655 · locator 6119
PJM’s requirement that new data centers bring their own new generation capacity effectively turns off and resets if PJM can meet its reliability requirement for three years in a row.
verified · Source version 80655 · locator 6514
If passing data center costs onto other customers is unjust and unreasonable now, it would still be unjust and unreasonable in three years – FERC must reject that part of PJM’s proposal.
verified · Source version 80657 · locator 3634
Interim Resource Adequacy Service (IRAS) provides a framework to connect new Large Load customers that bring their own new power supply.
verified · Source version 80657 · locator 4071
Docket No. ER26-3515-000 - Pending FERC Approval
unverified · Source version 80659 · locator unknown
New Large Loads can avoid this condition on taking transmission service by bringing new capacity to the system, as described below.
unverified · Source version 80661 · locator unknown
Data centers must bring their own clean electricity generation capacity onto the grid and be willing to get curtailed first when there are grid reliability issues.
Assessments
The verified commitment sought a permanent requirement that data centers bring their own new generation capacity online. Verified evidence shows Pallone directly pressed FERC to reject PJM's three-year reset/off-ramp, which is material advocacy toward the outcome, but the relevant PJM docket was still pending FERC approval as of the evidence provided. A pending proposal and advocacy do not establish enactment of a permanent requirement, so the outcome remains unresolved rather than delivered or partial.