“The NDAA has long served as a bipartisan vehicle to strengthen our national security and support our servicemembers. However, we are deeply concerned by the inclusion of Section 2835, which would grant extraordinary eminent domain authority to the federal government to circumvent established environmental protections for the benefit of a single private company. Given the sweeping implications of this provision, we believe this policy rider does not belong in the NDAA and, therefore, should be removed from the final conference agreement,” wrote the lawmakers.
Press congressional defense-bill negotiators to remove Section 2835, the Hunt Amendment provision granting eminent-domain authority for the Sable Offshore project, from the final Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act.
Occurrences
As Members of the California Congressional Delegation, we write to strongly urge you to remove Section 2835 from the Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) as ongoing conference negotiations continue.
Evidence
verified · Source version 88833 · locator 639
we write to strongly urge you to remove Section 2835 from the Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
verified · Source version 88832 · locator 1670
led 30 of their colleagues in calling on House and Senate Armed Services Committee leaders to reject the Hunt Amendment’s provision
unverified · Source version 88837 · locator unknown
Passed House amended July 22, 2026; Roll No. 278: 216-212. Received in Senate Sept. 14, 2026.
verified · Source version 88838 · locator 3479
Amendment Author: Hunt of Texas Part A Amendment No. 7
unverified · Source version 88840 · locator unknown
Secretary of Defense is authorized to acquire, by purchase, donation, exchange, or condemnation
Assessments
The judged commitment is the action to press House and Senate Armed Services Committee leaders to remove Section 2835 from the FY2027 NDAA conference agreement. Verified evidence shows Carbajal led colleagues in calling on those leaders to reject the Hunt Amendment provision and signed a letter strongly urging removal of Section 2835. That fulfills the promised action during the same federal House term. The separate final outcome of removal from the enacted defense bill is not established by verified evidence here, but the canonical commitment is to press negotiators, not prove enactment.