Will oppose Senate Water Resources Development Act language and permitting pressure that would allow Nebraska’s Perkins County Canal to cut through Sedgwick County and take South Platte water from Colorado.

Lauren Boebert · Colorado · Republican

policy impact 0.70 specificity 0.78 extraction confidence 86%

Commitment kind: action. Promised action: Oppose or refuse to accept Senate language and permitting pressure that would let the Perkins County Canal take South Platte water through Sedgwick County.. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired. U.S. Representative for Colorado’s 4th District discussing Colorado water policy and opposition to the Perkins County Canal in an October 2026 official House press release/guest opinion excerpt.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

“If that Senate language moves forward and the Corps is pushed to sign off, the Supreme Court won’t matter,” Rep. Boebert wrote. “The permit becomes the project. I will not trade away Sedgwick County in a permitting deadline written for another state.”

Boebert committed not to trade away Sedgwick County through a permitting deadline tied to Senate language for the Perkins County Canal.

REP. BOEBERT IN THE DENVER GAZETTE ON FIGHTING FOR WATER PROJECTS AND COLORADO’S FUTURE | Representative Lauren Boebert
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

unverified · Source version 89268 · locator unknown

"I will not trade away Sedgwick County in a permitting deadline written for another state."

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Within the lookback window, Boebert publicly opposed the Senate WRDA permitting deadline language for the Perkins County Canal and framed it as a threat to Sedgwick County and Colorado water.

partial same_term A for effort

The Denver Gazette: Funding water projects ensures Colorado's Future | Representative Lauren Boebert
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 89270 · locator unknown

"construction of the Perkins County Canal diversion and related infrastructure"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Reported Senate bill text includes Section 1379, which directs expedited documentation for Nebraska's Perkins County Canal permit and sets a February 15, 2028 deadline.

unresolved same_term

S. 4949 Reported in Senate - Water Resources Development Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 89272 · locator unknown

"457 S. 4949"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The Senate calendar still listed S. 4949 on General Orders on October 9, 2026, indicating the Senate WRDA language had not yet been finally enacted or defeated by the as-of date.

unresolved same_term

Senate Calendars for October 9, 2026 - 119th Congress, 2nd Session-GENERAL ORDERS
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 89274 · locator unknown

"expedite a permit to construct the Perkins County Canal"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Ricketts' official statement confirms the Senate-side WRDA provision Boebert opposed: an amendment to speed permitting for the Perkins County Canal after committee action.

unresolved same_term

Ricketts Issues Statement After Voting to Support Perkins County Canal, Nebraska Water Infrastructure
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 89276 · locator unknown

"Boebert | Republican | CO | Yea"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Boebert voted for the House WRDA bill on September 16, 2026. This shows activity on WRDA during the lookback window, but it does not by itself prove the Senate Perkins County Canal language was removed.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

No assessments yet.