I will keep fighting for military assistance for Ukraine.

John B. Larson · Connecticut · Democratic

spending impact 0.68 specificity 0.48 extraction confidence 92%

Commitment kind: action. Promised action: Keep fighting for military assistance for Ukraine.. Promised outcome: Military assistance for Ukraine.. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired. Joint Connecticut House delegation statement during Larson's federal House term responding to reports President Trump may ease Russian sanctions.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

unverified · Source version 89380 · locator unknown

"We will keep fighting for military assistance for Ukraine and real sanctions that no president can waive away as a favor."

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Within the 30-day lookback window, Larson and the Connecticut House delegation explicitly reaffirmed the exact commitment to keep fighting for Ukraine military assistance, but this is a continued-effort statement rather than enacted aid.

unresolved same_term A for effort

John B. Larson (via Public) / Connecticut House Delegation Statement on Reports President Trump is Seeking to Ease Russian Sanctions
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 89382 · locator unknown

"Furthermore, this bill would only enable the President’s penchant for imposing reckless tariffs at the expense of the American consumer – effectively handing the President the power to raise costs on American workers and families by more than $8,000 a year– while providing zero additional military assistance for Ukraine."

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Inside the lookback window, Larson joined the delegation’s explanation that they opposed the Senate sanctions bill because it lacked additional Ukraine military assistance and enforcement language.

unresolved same_term A for effort

CT House Delegation Statement On Russia Sanctions Bill | Press Releases | Congresswoman Jahana Hayes
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 89384 · locator unknown

"Larson (CT) | Democratic | CT | Yea"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Larson voted yes on House passage of H.R. 2913, the Ukraine Support Act, an effort toward new Ukraine support that had not been enacted as of the latest status found.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 89386 · locator unknown

"July 20, 2026 Read the second time and placed on the calendar"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The House-passed Ukraine Support Act remained a Senate-calendar measure, showing the 2026 assistance push was still unresolved rather than enacted.

unresolved same_term

H.R. 2913 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS) - Ukraine Support Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 89388 · locator unknown

"Larson (CT) | Democratic | CT | Yea"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Larson voted yes on the Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024, a concrete prior vote for Ukraine security assistance.

partial unknown A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 89390 · locator unknown

"$13,772,460,000, to remain available until September 30, 2025, shall be for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative"

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The 2024 supplemental that Larson supported became law and included Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative funding, supporting partial delivery of the broader commitment.

partial unknown

Public Law 118-50
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

No assessments yet.