That’s why I introduced the PETSAFE Act : it’s so our counties can use emergency funds they already have to shelter and rescue pets, without a single new dollar of taxpayer spending.
I will allow Florida counties to use existing emergency funds to shelter and rescue pets during storms without new taxpayer spending.
Occurrences
Evidence
unverified · Source version 89651 · locator unknown
That’s why I introduced the PETSAFE Act: it’s so our counties can use emergency funds they already have to shelter and rescue pets, without a single new dollar of taxpayer spending.
verified · Source version 89656 · locator 1343
Mr. Mast (for himself, Mr. Buchanan, Ms. Titus, Ms. Chu, Ms. Simon, and Mr. Carter of Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
verified · Source version 89658 · locator 1739
A State or local or tribal government may use amounts from a grant under this section to perform emergency preparedness activities that support companion animals
unverified · Source version 89660 · locator unknown
H.R. 7438 | PETSAFE Act of 2026 Official Title To amend the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to support emergency preparedness and response efforts for companion animals.Sponsor Rep. Mast, Brian J. [R-FL-21]Introduced February 9, 2026 Lastest Action February 10, 2026 - Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
verified · Source version 89662 · locator 1925
the Federal share of the cost of an activity carried out using funds made available under the program shall not exceed 50 percent.
Assessments
Verified evidence shows Mast introduced H.R. 7438/PETSAFE Act and that the bill text would permit state, local, or tribal governments to use grant funds for emergency preparedness activities supporting companion animals. That is material effort attributable to Mast. However, the verified evidence does not show enactment or operative legal change, and current U.S. Code language cited remains unchanged. Because the commitment is judged as an outcome to allow counties to use existing emergency funds, introduction alone does not deliver it, and no deadline has expired.