That means cutting government spending, lowering taxes, and putting America First in our trade policies.
Cut government spending to help rein in inflation.
Occurrences
Evidence
Congressman Tom Barrett announced he secured nearly $4.1 million in federal funding for mid-Michigan communities as part of the government funding package (H.R. 5371) signed into law. The release says the package funded government through January 30, 2026 and included appropriations bills with community project funding Barrett requested and secured.
Barrett announced another $126.6 million in federal funding for five mid-Michigan projects as part of appropriations bills signed into law. The release frames this as funding Barrett fought for and secured in H.R. 6938.
Barrett said he voted to pass H.R. 1, describing it as legislation that would prevent a large tax hike, lower energy costs, and rescind Inflation Reduction Act funds from Department of Energy programs that fail to meet energy needs.
Barrett said he is fighting to bring prices down for Michiganders and tied that effort to reforms in the Working Families Tax Cuts, arguing Congress is lowering energy costs and that his work helps reduce utility bills.
Barrett joined a bipartisan group of first-term colleagues requesting that pay for members of Congress be withheld during government shutdowns.
Barrett helped introduce the SNAP Fraud Reporting Act to improve transparency and preserve the program for the most vulnerable.
Assessments
The evidence shows Barrett took several actions aligned with the promise’s direction, including backing rescissions of some federal funds, introducing or supporting anti-fraud/transparency measures, and endorsing withholding member pay during shutdowns. Those are concrete efforts toward spending restraint and inflation-related messaging. But the record provided does not show that he delivered a clear, broad reduction in overall federal government spending sufficient to say the promise was fulfilled. In fact, some evidence shows him securing district appropriations, which cuts against a full-delivery finding on a promise to cut spending. Because he made real legislative efforts in the same term but the promised outcome was not clearly achieved, partial credit is the best fit.