I remain committed to working to cut regulations and taxes in Congress so Oklahoma families can keep more of their hard-earned money.

Frank D. Lucas · Oklahoma · Republican

policy impact 80.00 specificity 70.00 extraction confidence 9400%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

I remain committed to working to cut regulations and taxes in Congress, ensuring Oklahoma’s families are able to keep more of their hard-earned money at the end of the day.

Commitment to pursue lower taxes and fewer regulations in Congress.

Home
primary · campaign_site · model gpt-5.4-mini

Frank supports lowering taxes, reducing burdensome regulations, and increasing free and fair trade- guaranteeing more Oklahomans take home more money at the end of a long-day’s work.

Commits to lower taxes, reduce regulations, and expand trade to leave families with more income.

Issues Archive - Frank Lucas
campaign · campaign_site · model gpt-5.4-mini

Mr. Lucas is listed as a cosponsor of H.R. 142, the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025, which would require major executive branch rules to be approved by a joint resolution before taking effect.

Cosponsoring a bill to require congressional approval for major executive rules reflects a commitment to reducing regulations.

H.R. 142 (IH) - Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025 - BILLS-119hr142ih | Content Details | GovInfo
primary · other · model gpt-5.4-mini

This historic piece of legislation also secures vital funding for the FAA Academy in OKC and prevents a disastrous tax hike on Oklahomans.

Lucas supports legislation that prevents a tax hike on Oklahomans.

Lucas on Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill: "Necessary for Oklahoma"
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

unverified · Source version 8979 · locator unknown

H.R. 3690 — Securing Innovation in Financial Regulation Act. Sponsor: Rep. Lucas, Frank D. [R-OK-3] (Introduced 06/03/2025). Latest Action: House - 06/03/2025 Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture... Tracker: This bill has the status Introduced.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Lucas introduced legislation aimed at financial regulation reform, showing concrete action toward cutting regulation.

partial unknown A for effort

Frank D. Lucas | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 91%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 8980 · locator unknown

Cosponsors listed include Frank D. Lucas (OK). The bill's full title is 'Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025.'

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Lucas cosponsored a major anti-regulation bill intended to constrain executive regulation.

partial unknown A for effort

H.R. 142 (IH) - Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025 - BILLS-119hr142ih | Content Details | GovInfo
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 8981 · locator unknown

Cosponsors include Frank D. Lucas (OK). The bill's full title is '1071 Repeal to Protect Small Business Lending Act' and it was introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Financial Services.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Lucas supported a bill repealing a federal lending-data requirement, another concrete deregulatory action.

partial unknown A for effort

H.R. 976 (IH) - 1071 Repeal to Protect Small Business Lending Act - BILLS-119hr976ih | Content Details | GovInfo
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 85%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 92998 · locator unknown

Roll Call 311 | Bill Number: H. J. Res. 213 Sep 16, 2026, 06:49 PM | 119th Congress, 2nd Session Vote Question: On Passage Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the “California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision” Status: Passed Lucas | Lucas | Republican | OK | Yea

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Lucas voted yea on House passage of H.J. Res. 213, a Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution targeting an EPA-related rule. This is fresh same-term evidence of effort on the regulatory-cut side, but House passage alone is not enactment.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 58152 · locator unknown

Roll Call 305 | Bill Number: H. R. 9500 Sep 15, 2026, 10:15 PM | 119th Congress, 2nd Session Vote Question: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended Tax Relief for Fraud Victims Act Status: Passed Lucas | Lucas | Republican | OK | Yea

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Lucas voted yea on House passage of H.R. 9500, the Tax Relief for Fraud Victims Act. This is concrete same-term effort on the tax-relief side, but the source shows House passage, not enactment.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 82432 · locator unknown

Roll Call 190 | Bill Number: H. R. 1 Jul 03, 2025, 02:31 PM | 119th Congress, 1st Session Vote Question: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment One Big Beautiful Bill Act Status: Passed Lucas | Lucas | Republican | OK | Aye

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Lucas voted aye on final House concurrence in H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act; paired with the Public Law 119-21 record, this is direct same-term participation in enacted tax-cut and deregulatory legislation.

delivered same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 70305 · locator unknown

Sec. 60023. Rescission of environmental review implementation funds. Sec. 60024. Rescission of low-carbon transportation materials grants. Sec. 60025. John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Sec. 60026. Project sponsor opt-in fees for environmental reviews. TITLE VII--FINANCE Subtitle A--Tax Sec. 70001. References to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, etc. Chapter 1--Providing Permanent Tax Relief for Middle-class Families and Workers Sec. 70101. Extension and enhancement of reduced rates.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The enacted public law includes environmental-review funding/fee provisions and a tax title providing permanent tax relief and reduced-rate extensions, showing completed federal action on both regulation-related and tax-cut parts of the commitment.

delivered same_term

Public Law 119-21 - H.R. 1, One Big Beautiful Bill Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 70305 · locator unknown

``(4) Deadline for environmental reviews for which a fee is paid.--Notwithstanding section 107(g)(1)-- ``(A) an environmental assessment for which a fee is paid under this section shall be completed not later than 180 days after the date on which the fee is paid; and ``(B) an environmental impact statement for which a fee is paid under this section shall be completed not later than 1 year after the date of publication of the notice of intent to prepare the environmental impact statement. TITLE VII--FINANCE Subtitle A--Tax SEC. 70001. REFERENCES TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986, ETC. CHAPTER 1--PROVIDING PERMANENT TAX RELIEF FOR MIDDLE-CLASS FAMILIES AND WORKERS SEC. 70101. EXTENSION AND ENHANCEMENT OF REDUCED RATES. (a) In General.-- <<NOTE: 26 USC 1.>> Section 1(j) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, and before January 1, 2026'', and (2) by striking ``2018 Through 2025'' in the heading and inserting ``Beginning After 2017''.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The enacted public law contains environmental-review deadline changes and tax provisions extending and enhancing reduced rates, supporting delivery of the regulation-and-tax commitment when paired with Lucas's vote.

delivered same_term

Public Law 119-21 - H.R. 1, One Big Beautiful Bill Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 93000 · locator unknown

H.R. 9500.-- To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on deductions for personal casualty losses and to provide for increased taxpayer relief with respect to theft losses involving fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Referred to Ways and Means June 29, 2026. Rules suspended. Passed House amended Sept. 15, 2026; Roll No. 305: 408-17. Received in Senate and referred to Finance Sept. 16, 2026.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The October 19 official calendar lists Senate Finance referral as the latest action, with no enactment recorded. Combined with Lucas's previously documented yea vote, this supports concrete tax-relief effort whose legislative outcome remains unresolved.

unresolved same_term A for effort

House Calendars for October 19, 2026 - 119th Congress, 2nd Session-HISTORY OF BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS - HOUSE BILLS
secondary · model gpt-6.1-sol · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 93002 · locator unknown

Passed House Sept. 16, 2026; Roll No. 311: 214-208. Received in Senate Sept. 17, 2026.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The October 19 calendar's H.J. Res. 213 entry ends with Senate receipt, recording no Senate passage or enactment of the harbor-craft regulatory repeal. Lucas's previously documented yea vote remains evidence of effort; this measure remains unresolved and does not supersede the enacted-law evidence already recorded.

unresolved same_term A for effort

House Calendars for October 19, 2026 - 119th Congress, 2nd Session-HISTORY OF BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS - HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTIONS
secondary · model gpt-6.1-sol · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial. same_term A for effort

Lucas took concrete same-term congressional action toward the regulatory side of the promise by sponsoring H.R. 3690 and cosponsoring deregulatory bills such as H.R. 976 and H.R. 142 in the 119th Congress. However, the cited measures were introduced or referred rather than enacted, and the evidence does not show a completed federal tax-cut outcome attributable to him. Because the promise covered cutting regulations and taxes, and the record shows meaningful effort but not full delivery, partial credit is appropriate.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial. same_term A for effort

Lucas took concrete congressional action toward the regulatory side of the promise by sponsoring H.R. 3690 and cosponsoring deregulatory measures including H.R. 976 and H.R. 142 in the 119th Congress. The evidence does not show that these measures became law or that he delivered actual tax cuts, so the broad promised result of cutting regulations and taxes for Oklahoma families is only partially supported. The actions qualify for an effort badge because they are serious legislative attempts toward the promise.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 83%