I am fighting for pricing transparency to empower consumers, drive competition, and lower costs across the board. We must also take aggressive action to lower drug prices and eliminate wasteful spending in our healthcare system.
Fight for healthcare pricing transparency, lower drug prices, and reduce wasteful healthcare spending.
Occurrences
introduced the Protecting Equal Access to Thyroid (PEAT) Act of 2026, legislation to protect patient access to desiccated thyroid extract (DTE)
I am fighting for pricing transparency to empower consumers, drive competition, and lower costs across the board. We must also take aggressive action to lower drug prices and eliminate wasteful spending in our healthcare system.
Evidence
I am fighting for pricing transparency to empower consumers, drive competition, and lower costs across the board. We must also take aggressive action to lower drug prices and eliminate wasteful spending in our healthcare system.
The House passed a long-needed health care price transparency measure. The page says the bill increases price transparency throughout the health care system and lowers costs by requiring insurers and PBMs to disclose negotiated drug rebates and discounts.
Assessments
Rulli’s office still treats the issue as an active priority, and the House did advance a price-transparency measure that aligns with part of the promise. But the evidence does not show Rulli personally securing the full package of lower drug prices and reduced wasteful spending, so this is only partial credit rather than full delivery.
Rulli has continued to advocate for healthcare price transparency, lower drug prices, and reduced wasteful healthcare spending as an active federal priority. The broader House Republican healthcare transparency agenda advanced during his congressional tenure, but the evidence does not show that he personally authored, sponsored, secured enactment of, or materially delivered a concrete federal outcome covering the full promise. Because the cited policy movement supports the direction of the pledge but falls short of candidate-specific delivery, this merits partial credit rather than full delivery.