unverified · Source version 23389 · locator unknown
On April 28, 2026, Rep. Analilia Mejia joined other members to introduce the Living Wage for All Act, which raises the federal minimum wage to $25 per hour and frames the effort around workers needing a living wage as prices rise and profits grow.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Concrete federal action in the lookback window showing Mejia advancing wages policy tied to cost-of-living pressures; this supports effort toward the broader promise, though it does not itself document antitrust or monopoly-breaking legislation.
unverified · Source version 9035 · locator unknown
The press release says Congressmembers Delia Ramirez, Jesús García, Lateefah Simon, and Analilia Mejia introduced the Living Wage for All Act to raise the federal minimum wage to $25 per hour.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Independent official confirmation that Mejia participated in a live legislative introduction aimed at wages, but not monopolies specifically.
unverified · Source version 9117 · locator unknown
The official House website identifies Analilia Mejia as a sitting U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 11th District and shows the site launched with her sworn-in news on April 20, 2026.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Establishes that any relevant evidence in the lookback period falls within Mejia's current federal term, but it does not show action on the monopoly/prices/wages claim itself.
The Clerk’s member page lists Analilia Mejia as NJ-11 Democrat with oath of office Apr. 20, 2026, and shows her committee assignment on Homeland Security; no antitrust, monopoly-breakup, or similar bill action appears on this page.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Confirms current service and provides no evidence of delivery or failed attempts on the claim, leaving the claim unresolved in the lookback window.
unresolvedsame_term
Analilia Mejia
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 88%
unverified · Source version 23390 · locator unknown
GovInfo records a House concurrent resolution from May 20, 2026 with Analilia Mejia among the sponsors, showing she is active on federal legislation during the period even though the measure is unrelated to monopolies, prices, or wages.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Additional official sign of active legislative participation, but not direct support for the specific monopoly-breaking promise.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official bill record confirms Mejia as a cosponsor of the Living Wage For All Act, supporting the wages portion of the promise but not monopoly breakup.
The Living Wage for All Act also ensures wages do not fall behind again by establishing a standard
Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Mejia’s office described the bill as wage legislation tied to cost-of-living pressure, reinforcing partial action on wages but not antitrust delivery.
Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): In the lookback window, Mejia advanced a small-business disaster-loan information bill; it does not document monopoly breakup, price action, or wage suppression remedies.
To amend the Small Business Act to require Federal agencies to provide enhanced debriefing materials
Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): A lookback-window Mejia bill concerned SBIR/STTR award-denial feedback, not breaking up monopolies or addressing prices and wages.
unverified · Source version 69178 · locator unknown
Sponsors
Analilia Mejia(NJ)
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Mejia sponsored a September 2026 voting-rights resolution during the lookback window; this is unrelated to monopoly breakup and leaves the core promise unresolved.
unverified · Source version 80524 · locator unknown
Roll Call 312 | Bill Number: H. R. 9340
Sep 16, 2026, 06:53 PM
Ratepayer Protection Act
Status: Passed
Mejia | Mejia | Democratic | NJ | Yea
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): During the lookback window, Mejia voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which passed the House. This is a concrete same-term vote related to ratepayer costs but not to breaking up monopolies or wage suppression.
unverified · Source version 80526 · locator unknown
Last Action Date Listed
September 24, 2026
Actions
Received, Read the first time, Read the second time and placed on the calendar
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): GovInfo shows H.R. 9340 had only reached the Senate calendar by September 24, 2026, so Mejia's yes vote was an effort rather than enacted delivery of any price-related measure.
unverified · Source version 80526 · locator unknown
Full Title
An Act To amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to establish a Federal standard relating to the recovery of the full, incremental costs of upgrades that serve large-load customers, and for other purposes.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The bill's official title indicates it addresses utility-cost allocation for large-load customers, not antitrust breakup or wage suppression. It supports only a narrow partial price-related effort.
unverified · Source version 80509 · locator unknown
Mejia Secures Six New Jersey Water Infrastructure Priorities in House-Passed Bill
September 25, 2026
Press Release
For Immediate Release: September 21, 2026
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Mejia's latest official releases in the lookback window include water infrastructure work, which is unrelated to monopoly breakup, price-setting by monopolies, or wage suppression.
unverified · Source version 80511 · locator unknown
Roll Call 313 | Bill Number: H. R. 9497
Sep 16, 2026, 06:58 PM
Water Resources Development Act
Status: Passed
Mejia | Mejia | Democratic | NJ | Yea
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Mejia voted yes on the Water Resources Development Act during the lookback window, but this does not show action on breaking up monopolies, prices driven by monopoly power, or suppressed wages.
unverified · Source version 80528 · locator unknown
U.S. Representative Analilia Mejia (NJ-11) today conducted an oversight visit at Delaney Hall, operated by GEO Group, following repeated complaints regarding conditions inside the detention facility
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This official colleague release documents lookback-window oversight activity by Mejia, but it concerns detention conditions rather than monopoly breakup, consumer prices, or wage suppression.
unverified · Source version 92462 · locator unknown
Ms. MEJIA. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 8882, the Main Street Competes Act.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Previously unlisted same-term effort: Mejia advocated House passage of legislation strengthening reporting and coordination concerning antitrust enforcement and small-business competition. The House passed it that day. This documents relevant legislative effort, but no monopoly breakup or demonstrated price or wage outcome. No new relevant development was located for October 15–17.
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): The official Senate referral version documents further procedural progress for the antitrust oversight bill Mejia supported. It concerns examining antitrust enforcement's effects on small businesses, rather than ordering monopoly breakups. The record establishes referral, not enactment; the commitment remains unresolved, with effort recorded separately.
Public state: unverifiedAs of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial.same_termA for effort
Evidence shows Mejia took some same-term action related to the wages portion of the promise by co-introducing the Living Wage for All Act in April 2026. That is a concrete legislative effort tied to rising prices and worker pay. However, the specific promise was to break up monopolies that drive up prices while suppressing wages, and the provided record does not show Mejia introducing, sponsoring, or materially advancing antitrust or monopoly-breakup legislation, nor achieving such an outcome. Because there is meaningful action on one part of the promise but no evidence of delivery on the monopoly-breaking component, the best judgment is partial rather than delivered or never.