Fight to protect every eligible American's right to vote and ensure votes are counted.

Gabe Vasquez · New Mexico · Democratic

oversight impact 0.86 specificity 0.91 extraction confidence 98%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Occurrences

Gabe will fight to protect every eligible American’s right to cast a ballot and have their votes counted

Promises to defend voting access and ballot counting.

Issues -
campaign · campaign_site · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

“On February 11, 2026, U.S. Representative Gabe Vasquez (NM-02) released this statement following his vote to protect American citizens’ voting rights... ‘Let’s be clear about what this is — an attempt to disenfranchise eligible American voters and prevent them from casting a ballot. It’s an attack on the free and fair elections that underpin our democracy...’ ... ‘He has pushed for additional funding to improve election security, help states administer safe and fair elections, and protect eligible voters and election volunteers.’

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Vasquez publicly stated his vote against restrictive federal voting legislation and framed it as protecting eligible voters, while also noting prior advocacy for election security and safe/fair election administration.

partial same_term A for effort

Rep. Vasquez Votes to Protect American Citizens’ Voting Rights from Government Overreach
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 92%

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Roll Call Number 101, Bill Number H.R. 22, Vote Question: On Motion to Recommit, Bill Title & Description: SAVE Act, Status: Failed, yea: 211, nay: 215.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The House clerk’s record shows the SAVE Act failed on a motion to recommit in the 119th Congress. This is concrete evidence of legislative opposition, but not of enactment of voting-rights protections.

never same_term

U.S. House of Representatives Roll Call Vote 101 on H.R. 22 (SAVE Act)
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 96%

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Mar 25, 2026 ... Vote Question: On Motion to Recommit ... Make the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful Act ... Status: Failed ... Votes by party ... Democratic 207 Yea, 0 Nay ... Vasquez Democratic New Mexico NM Yea.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Vasquez voted yes on a House floor motion in late March 2026, showing continued active participation in House voting. The vote is not directly a voting-rights measure, but it is consistent with ongoing legislative effort.

unresolved same_term

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives Roll Call 100 on H.R. 5103
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 71%

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

“House of Representatives' latest votes on Capitol Hill and view Roll Call Votes by the U.S Congress. Learn more About Legislation of the U.S. Congress & Votes in the House and Senate.”

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The member office maintains a votes-and-legislation page directing constituents to current House votes and roll-call records, indicating ongoing attention to legislative voting issues, but not a specific voting-rights outcome.

unresolved same_term

Votes and Legislation | Representative Gabe Vasquez
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 54%

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial. same_term A for effort

Evidence shows Vasquez took concrete action consistent with the promise by voting against federal legislation he said would disenfranchise eligible voters and by advocating funding for election security and fair election administration. However, the record provided does not show that he secured a clear enacted outcome that protected every eligible American's right to vote or ensured votes are counted nationwide. Because there is demonstrated effort and some protective action, but no completed broad policy delivery, partial credit is most appropriate.

provider openai · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 90%