If elected, I will support the Israeli Anti-Boycott Act and other Anti-Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) legislation.
Support the Israeli Anti-Boycott Act and other anti-BDS legislation.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Roll Call 428 | Bill Number: H. R. 5179; Vote Question: On Passage; Anti-BDS Labeling Act; Status: Passed; Guest Republican Mississippi Yea.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Roll Call 428 was on passage of H.R. 5179, the Anti-BDS Labeling Act. The vote status was Passed, and Michael Guest, Republican of Mississippi, is listed as voting Yea.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
GovInfo identifies H.R. 5179 as the Anti-BDS Labeling Act and gives its full title as a bill to require maintenance of country-of-origin markings for imported goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza.
Assessments
Guest directly supported anti-BDS legislation while serving in Congress by voting yea on House passage of H.R. 5179, the Anti-BDS Labeling Act. Because the promise was to support the Israeli Anti-Boycott Act and other anti-BDS legislation, a recorded affirmative vote on anti-BDS legislation satisfies the commitment. The 2024 action occurred after his initial term, so later_term timing applies.
The promise was to support anti-BDS legislation, not necessarily to enact a specific bill. Guest directly fulfilled that support pledge by voting "Yea" on House passage of H.R. 5179, the Anti-BDS Labeling Act, on September 18, 2024. That is clear official action in favor of anti-BDS legislation. The exact campaign-to-action term relationship is not established in the provided record, so timing is best marked unknown.
Guest promised to support the Israeli Anti-Boycott Act and other anti-BDS legislation. As a sitting U.S. Representative, he voted yea on House passage of H.R. 5179, the Anti-BDS Labeling Act, on September 18, 2024. That is direct official support for anti-BDS legislation, satisfying the substance of the promise. Because the cited fulfillment occurred in a later congressional term rather than the original campaign term, timing is later_term.