I support commonsense measures, like voter ID, that will better secure future elections
Support voter ID and other commonsense election-security measures.
Occurrences
I support commonsense measures, like voter ID, that will better secure future elections and give voters the confidence that legal ballots will be counted accurately.
Evidence
Flood released a statement after House passage of the bipartisan Housing for the 21st Century Act; the page documents his active role on a different policy area but does not mention voter ID or election-security measures.
The member office site shows recent 2026 activity and current service as U.S. Representative, but the visible recent releases do not show a voter-ID or election-security bill/action in the last lookback window.
Congress.gov lists Flood’s sponsored legislation and committee actions in the 119th Congress, demonstrating his ability to move bills through committee, but this page does not show a voter ID or election-security measure in the relevant lookback period.
This official Republican Study Committee release says members demanded Senate action on the SAVE Act, which it describes as strengthening voter ID and election security.
The release states the SAVE America Act adds a voter ID requirement for federal elections and was introduced as a renewed push to secure elections.
The Congressional Record entry reflects House floor proceedings involving Mike Flood during the 119th Congress, but the accessible excerpt does not contain a voter ID or election-security vote or statement.
Assessments
The promise is framed as support for voter ID and election-security measures, not a specific enacted law. The evidence shows such legislation was actively pushed by House Republicans during Flood's current term, which is consistent with his stated policy alignment, but the record provided does not show Flood sponsoring, co-sponsoring, voting for, or otherwise materially advancing a specific voter-ID or election-security measure himself. It also does not show that a relevant measure was enacted. Because there is some evidence the policy goal was being advanced by his caucus during the same term, but no direct proof of Flood's own concrete action or of completed delivery, the best judgment is partial rather than delivered or never.