Adrian fights to expand market access for Nebraska’s farmers and ranchers.
expand market access for Nebraska agriculture
Occurrences
Whether in our nation’s capital, around the world, or at home in Nebraska, Adrian is working alongside President Trump for fair market access for Nebraska beef, pork, grains and manufactured goods.
urging them to hold Mexico accountable ahead of the six-year joint review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)
working to expand market access
Smith led a bipartisan letter urging the Trump Administration to address Mexico’s burdensome non-tariff barriers affecting U.S. grain exports during the ongoing review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
I will continue working to expand markets for Nebraska agriculture and manufacturing, push back against unfair treatment of American producers and businesses, and ensure trade agreements work for the people who depend on them every day.
Evidence
The official bio says Adrian Smith has "tackled issues ranging from international market access for Nebraska goods" and that he "actively promotes market access for Nebraska products in Asia, South America, Europe, and throughout the world."
Smith and 109 colleagues sent a letter to USTR highlighting that USMCA delivers for American agriculture and emphasizing the need to fully enforce existing terms while addressing remaining barriers to U.S. agricultural products.
USTR says Malaysia committed to significant preferential market access for U.S. products, including dairy, horticultural products, poultry, pork, rice, and fuel ethanol.
Latest News: "A Long-Overdue Farm Bill for Nebraska Producers" (Article). The page excerpt says, "For ag producers across the Third District, spring is filled with hard work. Mornings start earlier and evenings stretch longer as they work to prepare for what lies ahead."
Congressman Adrian Smith (NE-03), Chair of the Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade, led a letter with 19 Republican colleagues to USTR and Treasury urging them to hold Mexico accountable ahead of the USMCA joint review, citing unfair tax and customs enforcement affecting U.S. companies operating in Mexico.
Smith said the administration had achieved multiple trade wins, including Taiwan eliminating tariffs on 94 percent of U.S. agricultural products, and emphasized that USMCA improvements were still needed and that benefits can fail to materialize when agreements are not robustly enforced.
The trade issues page states that recent developments include the administration beginning the USMCA review, trade deals with several partners, updated trade and agricultural products terms with Israel, and a major agreement with China that resumes Chinese purchases of U.S. soybeans; it also highlights Smith's November 2025 letter on USMCA benefits for American agriculture.
Smith said the new U.S.-Taiwan reciprocal trade agreement gives American farmers and ranchers fairer treatment, eliminates or reduces tariffs on 99 percent of tariff lines, and includes zero tariffs on 94 percent of agricultural goods.
Smith said he led a bipartisan letter with Agriculture Trade Caucus co-chairs and 13 colleagues urging the Trump administration to address Mexico’s non-tariff barriers that are affecting U.S. grain exports during the ongoing USMCA review.
USTR reported that the first bilateral USMCA review round included work aimed at reducing the trade deficit with Mexico, strengthening supply chains, and continuing discussions that would include agriculture and a level playing field.
USTR said the China visit produced greater market access for American farmers and ranchers, including reduced non-tariff barriers on agricultural products such as beef and poultry and re-registration of some U.S. meat export facilities.
The House press releases page lists Smith's June 11, 2026 release saying he led a bipartisan letter urging the Trump administration to address Mexico's burdensome non-tariff barriers affecting U.S. grain exports during the ongoing USMCA review.
USTR said the first bilateral USMCA review round advanced discussions and that future talks on June 16-17 in Washington would include agriculture and a level playing field.
USTR said the China visit reduced non-tariff barriers on agricultural products such as beef and poultry and led to re-registration of some U.S. meat export facilities.
Assessments
Smith materially worked on the promise during his current House term by leading letters, using his trade-subcommittee role, and pressing USTR and the administration to remove barriers affecting agricultural exports, especially through USMCA enforcement and Mexico-related grain access. There is also evidence of same-term U.S. trade outcomes expanding agricultural access abroad, including Taiwan, Malaysia, and China-related openings. But the record does not show a clearly attributable, Nebraska-specific expansion of market access delivered by Smith himself; the concrete gains are broader national executive-branch outcomes with only indirect or shared credit for him. That supports partial rather than full delivery.
Smith clearly worked on the promise in office through repeated trade letters, hearings, and advocacy focused on removing barriers under USMCA and other agreements. There were real same-term market-access gains for U.S. agriculture, including Taiwan, Malaysia, China, and ongoing Mexico review activity, which aligns with the promise’s direction. But the record here does not show a distinct, completed expansion of market access specifically for Nebraska agriculture that is primarily attributable to Smith himself, so full delivery is too strong. Because he materially advanced the issue and related market-opening outcomes occurred during his term, partial credit in the same term is the best fit.
Evidence shows Smith consistently worked to expand agricultural market access through his trade leadership role, letters to USTR, and public advocacy on USMCA and other agreements. There were real same-term market-access gains for U.S. agriculture, including Taiwan tariff reductions and other trade agreements affecting farm exports. However, the record does not show a clearly attributable, Nebraska-specific delivered outcome that he personally secured on the broad promise to expand market access for Nebraska agriculture. Because there is documented concrete effort and some relevant broader trade improvements during his term, but not enough to credit full fulfillment, the best judgment is partial.
Smith has ongoing federal advocacy directly tied to agricultural market access, including co-leading a 2025 letter pressing USTR to enforce USMCA and address barriers to U.S. agricultural products. There is also a same-term executive trade outcome expanding access for several U.S. agricultural products in Malaysia, but the evidence does not show Smith authored, sponsored, or materially caused that result. Because the record supports sustained effort and some relevant market-access progress, but not a clearly attributable completed delivery for Nebraska agriculture, partial credit is warranted.
Evidence shows Smith engaged in concrete advocacy for agricultural market access, including USMCA enforcement and addressing barriers to U.S. agricultural products. There is also contemporaneous federal action expanding agricultural market access in Malaysia, but the record does not show Smith alone caused or secured a completed, Nebraska-specific expansion matching the full promise. The best classification is partial fulfillment during the same term.