She will fight the gun grabbers in Washington DC and defend our constitutional rights.
She will fight gun control efforts in Washington, D.C., and defend the Second Amendment.
Occurrences
Evidence
I am a strong supporter of the Second Amendment which guarantees our right to keep and bear arms. I oppose any efforts to weaken this fundamental right or take firearms away from peaceful, law-abiding American citizens.
3/17 90 H.Res. 1115 On Ordering the Previous Question Yea Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 556) to prohibit the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from prohibiting the use of lead ammunition or tackle on certain Federal land or water...
This bill bars the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the Forest Service from prohibiting or regulating the use of lead ammunition or tackle on federal land or water.
Assessments
The promise was framed as advocacy and opposition to gun-control efforts, not as enactment of a specific law. During her same House term, Maloy publicly maintained a pro-Second Amendment position and took concrete aligned action by supporting floor consideration of H.R. 556, which sought to limit federal regulation of lead ammunition on federal lands and waters. Although the measure was not enacted in the reviewed evidence, her promise was to fight and defend, and the record shows same-term federal action consistent with that commitment.
Maloy has publicly maintained the promised Second Amendment position and took concrete same-term action by supporting advancement of H.R. 556, which would limit federal restrictions on lead ammunition on federal lands and waters. That demonstrates follow-through on fighting at least one federal firearms/ammunition-related restriction. However, the evidence shows advocacy and a procedural vote on a related measure, not a broader delivered policy outcome or enacted protection against gun control efforts in Washington, D.C., so the promise is best rated partial rather than delivered.