Work in Congress to reduce the power of federal administrative agencies and pursue administrative-state reform.

Harriet M. Hageman · Wyoming · Republican

policy impact 0.82 specificity 0.79 extraction confidence 97%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

I have fought regulators and bureaucrats in court; now I will do it in Congress.

Promises to continue fighting federal regulators and pursue reform of the administrative state in Congress.

ISSUES | Harriet Hageman
campaign · campaign_site · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

unverified · Source version 11221 · locator unknown

Under the heading "Deregulating the Administrative state," the campaign site says Congress has empowered unelected bureaucrats and that "We need real and fundamental reform of the Administrative State. I have fought regulators and bureaucrats in court; now I will do it in Congress."

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Campaign promise explicitly committed Hageman to reducing agency power and pursuing administrative-state reform in Congress.

unresolved same_term

ISSUES | Harriet Hageman
campaign · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 11315 · locator unknown

The House Judiciary Committee Republicans page lists Harriet M. Hageman as a Republican member of the Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust in the 119th Congress.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Her committee assignment shows she is positioned to work on administrative-state reform in Congress.

partial same_term

The Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 11316 · locator unknown

Congress.gov records that Hageman submitted questions for the record in the hearing "Reining in the Administrative State: Agency Adjudication and Other Agency Action" and identifies her as a member of the Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust from Wyoming.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): She actively participated in a congressional hearing focused on limiting administrative-state authority.

partial same_term A for effort

Reining in the Administrative State: Agency Adjudication and Other Agency Action
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 11317 · locator unknown

Congress.gov shows H.R. 432 was introduced by Rep. Hageman on 01/15/2025 and its text states it would "authorize the removal of an action from an administrative law judge of any administrative agency to a district court of the United States." The bill was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This is concrete legislative action aimed at reducing agency adjudicatory power, though it did not become law.

partial same_term A for effort

H.R.432 - Seventh Amendment Restoration Act
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 99%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 27324 · locator unknown

On June 3, 2026, the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries held a legislative hearing on four bills, and Chair Harriet Hageman said Republicans were working with local leaders to ensure American oceans keep producing for future generations. The hearing was framed around restoring sound science, transparency, and state management of marine resources.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Recent committee activity led by Hageman shows active congressional work to shift management toward states and away from heavier federal control.

delivered same_term A for effort

Restoring Commonsense Marine Resource Management | House Committee on Natural Resources
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 29693 · locator unknown

The committee's Water, Wildlife and Fisheries page lists Harriet Hageman as chair and says the subcommittee is working to improve federal government regulations so projects are less expensive, more transparent, and not delayed by unnecessary red tape.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Current official committee role directly ties Hageman to regulatory reduction and red-tape cutting in Congress.

delivered same_term

Water, Wildlife and Fisheries | House Committee on Natural Resources
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 61726 · locator unknown

“Ms. Hageman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary”

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official GPO bill text confirms Hageman introduced H.R. 9277, an APA judicial-review bill aimed at excluding agency evidence not grounded in reliable scientific principles and methods.

delivered same_term A for effort

H.R. 9277 Introduced in House (IH) - GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 61728 · locator unknown

“To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act requires de novo trial of the facts when agency action seeks a sanction.”

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official GPO bill text confirms Hageman introduced H.R. 9278, which would reduce deference to agency fact-finding in APA review when agency action seeks a sanction.

delivered same_term A for effort

H.R. 9278 Introduced in House (IH) - GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 85610 · locator unknown

September 24, 2026 Ms. Hageman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary * * * A BILL To amend title 31, United States Code, to require additional transparency with respect to the Judgment Fund, and for other purposes.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Within the lookback window, Hageman introduced H.R. 10558, a Judiciary Committee bill requiring added transparency over the federal Judgment Fund, a concrete congressional action tied to administrative-state oversight and reform.

delivered same_term A for effort

H. R. 10558 (Introduced-in-House)
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 85610 · locator 2698

“(e) (1) The Comptroller General of the United States shall review each settlement subject to payments under this chapter and submit to Congress an annual report identifying and analyzing the use of sue-and-settle tactics, including—

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): The new bill specifically targets agency litigation settlement practices by requiring GAO review and annual reporting on sue-and-settle tactics.

delivered same_term A for effort

H. R. 10558 (Introduced-in-House)
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 85612 · locator unknown

BUSINESS MEETING Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: Committee ordered favorably reported the following business items: ... H.R. 677, to establish a process to expedite the review of appeals of certain decisions by the Department of the Interior, with an amendment in the nature of a substitute;

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): In the lookback window, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee favorably reported Hageman’s H.R. 677, showing continued progress on a bill to accelerate administrative appeals and enable judicial review.

delivered same_term A for effort

Congressional Record, Volume 172 Issue 155 (Wednesday, September 30, 2026)
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 85614 · locator 435

Ms. Hageman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Official bill text identifies Hageman as the introducer of H.R. 677, the Expedited Appeals Review Act, one of her administrative-review reform measures in the same House term.

delivered same_term A for effort

H.R. 677 Reported in House - Expedited Appeals Review Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 85616 · locator unknown

If the Board of Land Appeals does not issue a final decision on an appeal by the deadline described in subsection (a)-- (1) the Department of the Interior decision is deemed to be a final agency action for purposes of section 704 of title 5, United States Code; and (2) notwithstanding section 706 of title 5, United States Code, judicial review of such decision shall be de novo.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The bill’s operative text would limit administrative delay by treating missed Interior Board deadlines as final agency action and providing de novo judicial review.

delivered same_term A for effort

H.R. 677 Engrossed in House - Expedited Appeals Review Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): delivered. same_term

This promise was framed as a commitment to work in Congress on administrative-state reform, not as a pledge to fully enact a specific reform package. The record shows Hageman materially pursued that objective during her current House term: she served on the relevant Administrative State subcommittee, participated in oversight hearings focused on limiting agency adjudication, and introduced H.R. 432 to shift some agency adjudications into federal court. Those are concrete same-term congressional actions aimed at reducing administrative-agency power, so the promise is best judged as delivered on its own terms, even though broader reform has not yet become law.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 92%

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): delivered. same_term

The promise was framed as working in Congress to reduce administrative-agency power and pursue administrative-state reform, not as guaranteeing enactment of a specific law. Hageman took concrete same-term congressional actions aligned with that promise: introducing H.R. 432 to shift certain agency adjudications to federal district court, participating in a hearing on reining in agency adjudication and agency action, and serving on the relevant House Judiciary subcommittee. Although the cited bill did not become law, the promised outcome was congressional work on administrative-state reform, which was fulfilled.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%