and address climate change.
Address climate change.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Her provision was included as part of the 2026 Energy, Water Development, and Related Agencies funding bill, which is now law. Specifically, it encourages the Department of Energy to prioritize grants available within the Weatherization Assistance Program for manufacturing housing skirting, awning, and other traditional means of energy efficiency.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The Committee encourages the Department to prioritize grants available within the Weatherization Assistance Program for manufacturing housing skirting, awning, and other traditional means of energy efficiency.
unverified · Source version 46977 · locator unknown
Her office said 51 policy priorities were included in appropriations bills, including Weatherization Assistance Program priorities for manufactured-home energy efficiency.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The Clerk recorded Perez voting Yea on H.J.Res.88, disapproving EPA's California Advanced Clean Cars II waiver decision.
Assessments
Gluesenkamp Perez achieved a concrete same-term climate-adjacent result by advancing enacted appropriations language prioritizing Weatherization Assistance Program grants for manufactured-home energy efficiency. That addresses energy use and emissions indirectly, but it is narrow compared with the broad promise to address climate change. Her vote to block California's stricter vehicle-emissions waiver also makes the record mixed, so the promise is not fully delivered.
The promise to address climate change is broad. The evidence shows Gluesenkamp Perez materially advanced and secured enacted appropriations language encouraging Department of Energy Weatherization Assistance Program grants for manufactured-home skirting, awnings, and other energy-efficiency measures. That is a real federal policy result during her current House term and is climate-adjacent because it can reduce energy use and emissions, but it is much narrower than delivering a comprehensive climate-change agenda. This supports partial delivery rather than full delivery.