Support an “all of the above” strategy for energy production in America
Support an all-of-the-above energy strategy.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Apr 23, 2026, 10:32 AM | 119th Congress, 2nd Session ... Vote Question: On Passage ... HEATS Act ... Status: Passed ... Representative Fry | Republican | South Carolina SC | Yea
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
May 13, 2026, 06:26 PM | 119th Congress, 2nd Session ... Vote Question: On Passage ... Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act ... Status: Passed ... Fry | Republican | South Carolina SC | Nay
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The Clerk's floor-votes page for September 4, 2026 lists 'Votes today' but shows no roll-call vote rows. Targeted searches did not surface an official Russell Fry energy action within the September 4-6, 2026 lookback window.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Sep 04, 2025, 11:00 AM | 119th Congress, 1st Session | Vote Question: On Passage | Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 | Status: Passed | Fry | Republican | SC | Yea
Assessments
Fry took same-term federal legislative actions consistent with parts of an all-of-the-above energy posture, including Yea votes on the HEATS Act and FY2026 Energy and Water appropriations. However, the evidence shows issue engagement and support for some energy-development measures rather than enactment or clear advancement of a comprehensive all-of-the-above energy strategy attributable to him. The Nay vote on a fuel-choice bill also limits confidence that the record fully matches the broad promise. Partial credit is appropriate rather than full delivery.
Fry has taken concrete same-term congressional action consistent with an all-of-the-above energy posture, including voting Yea on the HEATS Act, a geothermal energy development bill that passed the House. However, the record provided is too narrow to show full delivery of a broad all-of-the-above energy strategy, and his Nay vote on the Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act weakens the case for unequivocal fulfillment. Because the promise is framed as support rather than enactment, these votes justify partial credit, but not a delivered rating.