Making childcare cheaper by guaranteeing no family pays more than 7% of its income – under $10 a day for most families;
Guarantee that no family pays more than 7% of its income for childcare.
Occurrences
Evidence
H.R. 4418 is titled the Child Care for Working Families Act and states it is “To increase the quality and supply of child care and lower child care costs for families.” The bill was introduced July 15, 2025 and referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. André Carson is listed among the cosponsors. The bill text is the vehicle associated with the 7-percent childcare affordability pledge.
S. 2295, the Senate companion Child Care for Working Families Act, was introduced July 15, 2025 and read twice, then referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. The related-bills section identifies H.R. 4418 as the identical House bill. The bill remains at the introduced stage.
The report says that on April 27, 2023, Rep. Scott, Rep. Susan Wild, and other colleagues introduced H.R. 2976 / S. 1354, the Child Care for Working Families Act, “that would ensure that working families pay no more than seven percent of their income for child care,” and notes committee Republicans declined to mark it up.
The bill summary states it would “ensure that copayments are based on a sliding scale and that no family receiving assistance pays more than 7% of its household income on child care.” It was referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor on introduction.
Assessments
The promised outcome was a federal guarantee that no family would pay more than 7% of income for child care. The evidence shows Carson cosponsored the Child Care for Working Families Act in 2025, and earlier versions of the same proposal in prior Congresses contained the specific 7% affordability standard. However, the bills were only introduced and referred, with no enactment or even clear passage by either chamber. Because the promise concerns an actual policy guarantee and that outcome has not been delivered, it is not fulfilled. Carson did make a serious legislative effort through sponsorship/cosponsorship of the relevant bill, so effort credit applies, but the result remains undelivered.