I made a commitment early on that I would tear up Trump’s budget and write a new one.
Fight to protect NIH funding and biomedical research from Trump-era cuts.
Occurrences
Evidence
Murray said, “I fight for policies to hold giant pharmaceutical companies accountable and lower costs for all of us,” and framed health-care affordability as a central campaign issue.
Murray said she was “proud to have secured several significant, bipartisan funding increases for NIH over the past few years” and said she would “do everything I can to make sure we don’t take our foot off the gas here.”
Murray said the Trump administration’s NIH indirect-cost cap was “illegal” and would be “nothing short of catastrophic” for lifesaving research; the release says Congress’ bipartisan Labor-HHS appropriations bill prohibits modifications to NIH indirect costs.
Section 224 says indirect-cost rules “shall continue to apply to the National Institutes of Health” and Section 240 limits multiyear-award obligations; the NIH title appropriates major funding for NIH accounts, including $48.7 billion for NIH and $226 million for the Cures Act account in the enacted law.
Murray said that in the government funding bill Trump signed into law on Feb. 3, 2026, she secured $48.7 billion for NIH, a $415 million increase, and that the bill rejected the Trump administration’s proposal to cap indirect cost rates at 15% and other cuts to NIH.
Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY 2026, (P.L. 119-75, Division B, Title II, Sec. 224), the provisions relating to indirect costs apply to NIH awards.
In FY 2026, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) received a budget of $440.6 million. This funding was secured under H.R.7148 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026.
Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY 2026, (P.L. 119-75, Division B, Title II, Sec. 224), the provisions relating to indirect costs apply to NIH awards.
Public Law 119-75 enacted the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026.
Assessments
Congress enacted the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (P.L. 119-75) on Feb 3, 2026, which appropriated $48.7 billion for NIH and included statutory language (e.g., Section 224 and related NIH title provisions) preserving existing NIH indirect-cost protections and rejecting the Trump administration's proposed indirect-cost cap. NIH budget pages and the NIH grants policy statement reflect these enacted protections and FY2026 funding. Senator Murray publicly linked her efforts to securing the funding and blocking the proposed cuts in a Senate press release and had previously campaigned and spoken against the administration's proposal, indicating she materially advanced this outcome while in office. On that basis the promise to fight to protect NIH funding and biomedical research from Trump-era cuts is fulfilled in the same Senate term.
The promise was to fight to protect NIH funding and biomedical research from Trump-era cuts. During Murray's same Senate term, the FY 2026 appropriations law was enacted with substantial NIH funding, reportedly $48.7 billion, including an increase, and it preserved protections against the Trump administration's proposed indirect-cost cap and related cuts. Murray was an active federal officeholder, publicly opposed the proposed cuts, and claimed credit for securing the NIH funding and blocking the indirect-cost changes in the enacted government funding bill. Because the promised protection became law during her current term and the evidence ties her materially to the outcome, this counts as delivered. The effort badge is warranted because the record shows active legislative and public advocacy, not merely passive support.
Murray promised to fight to protect NIH funding and biomedical research from Trump-era cuts. The enacted Feb. 3, 2026 federal funding law provided $48.7 billion for NIH, increased funding by $415 million, and rejected key Trump administration cut proposals including the 15% indirect-cost cap. Evidence ties Murray directly to securing the NIH funding and blocking those cuts while she remained in federal office, so the promise was delivered in the same term. The effort badge is warranted because she actively opposed the proposed cuts and materially advanced the enacted appropriations outcome.