Davis announced a new bipartisan caucus focused on strengthening the Berry Amendment and keeping defense supply chains American-made.
Strengthen the Berry Amendment and keep defense supply chains American-made.
Occurrences
As co-chair of this caucus, I am doubling down on a simple principle: the equipment that defends the United States should be made in the United States.
Evidence
Text contains those laws in effect on May 7, 2026 ... This section is popularly known as the "Berry Amendment" ... Pub. L. 119–60, div. A, title VIII, §831(b), Dec. 18, 2025 ... Pub. L. 119–75, div. A, title VIII, §8037, Feb. 3, 2026, ... may be used for the purchase or manufacture of a flag of the United States unless such flags are treated as covered items under section 4862(b) of title 10, United States Code.
The Defense Appropriations Act provides a total discretionary allocation of $839.2 billion ... o $1.5 billion for the Maritime Industrial Base to invest in critical areas including supplier capacity and capability, strategic outsourcing, workforce training, and technology and infrastructure ... o $4.3 million for the establishment of a Civil Reserve Manufacturing Network ... o $4.5 billion for hypersonic test infrastructure, testing, and weapons systems ... o $326.9 million for bioindustrial manufacturing to advance energetics and mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities.
LOG ID 5346 | SPONSOR Davis | TYPE Bill | DESCRIPTION The amendment would remove the $150,000 small purchases loophole in the Berry Amendment to strengthen the domestic textile industrial base, creating jobs and ensuring the U.S. military is not purchasing textile materials from malign actors like the PRC. | OUTCOME Agreed to by voice vote.
5346 | Davis | Bill | The amendment would remove the $150,000 small purchases loophole in the Berry Amendment to strengthen the domestic textile industrial base, creating jobs and ensuring the U.S. military is not purchasing textile materials from malign actors like the PRC. | ... | Agreed to by voice vote
Sec. 831 - Applicability of Berry Amendment to procurement of certain seafood ... The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment ... Sec. 832 - Enhancement of defense supply chain resilience and secondary source qualification ...
Assessments
Davis materially advanced the promise by sponsoring a FY2026 NDAA markup amendment to remove the Berry Amendment small-purchases loophole, and that amendment was agreed to by voice vote. The final FY2026 NDAA and defense appropriations also included Berry Amendment and defense supply-chain provisions, showing same-term federal progress toward American-made defense supply chains. However, the evidence does not establish that Davis's specific amendment was enacted into final law or that he was directly responsible for the enacted provisions, so this supports partial credit rather than full delivery.
Davis directly advanced a Berry Amendment strengthening proposal in the FY2026 NDAA markup: his amendment to remove the $150,000 small-purchase loophole for covered textile purchases was agreed to by voice vote. That is a concrete, candidate-specific effort aligned with the promise. However, the evidence does not establish that Davis's specific amendment was enacted into final law or that he was materially responsible for the broader FY2026 defense supply-chain and industrial-base provisions that became law. Because the policy area saw some same-term federal movement and Davis made a serious direct contribution, but full delivery is not proven, partial credit is appropriate.
The Berry Amendment remains in force and recent FY2026 federal defense legislation/appropriations appear to have strengthened related domestic sourcing and defense supply-chain resilience policies. However, the evidence does not show Donald G. Davis personally authored, sponsored, or materially advanced the relevant provisions. Because the policy direction was partly achieved during his current House term but candidate-specific credit is not established, this merits partial rather than full delivery.