An amendment to prohibit the USDA from using funds to implement any Forest Service reorganization, relocation, office closure, research station closure, workforce reduction, or transfer of functions unless the Secretary certifies to Congress that the action will not increase wildfire risk;
Janelle Bynum will oppose USDA-funded reorganization or closures that increase wildfire risk.
Occurrences
Evidence
Rep. Bynum said she introduced 13 amendments to the Republicans’ Farm Bill, including: “An amendment to prohibit the USDA from using funds to implement any Forest Service reorganization, relocation, office closure, research station closure, workforce reduction, or transfer of functions unless the Secretary certifies to Congress that the action will not increase wildfire risk.”
The committee’s amendment list shows Bynum amendment 87 as: “Prohibits the USDA from using funds to implement any Forest Service reorganization, relocation, office closure, research station closure, workforce reduction, or transfer of functions unless the Secretary certifies to Congress that the action will not increase wildfire risk.” The same page marks it as “Submitted.”
The amendment text states: “None of the funds authorized or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to carry out any reorganization, relocation, consolidation, closure, transfer of functions, reduction in force, or other significant staffing or operational change within the Forest Service unless” certification is provided that the change will not “increase wildfire risk,” “diminish wildfire preparedness,” or reduce response, fuels treatment, incident management, or research capacity.
Assessments
Bynum promised to oppose USDA-funded Forest Service reorganizations or closures that would increase wildfire risk. During her federal House term, she publicly introduced and formally submitted an amendment to the Farm Bill barring USDA funds for Forest Service reorganization, relocation, closures, workforce reductions, or transfers unless the Secretary certified they would not increase wildfire risk. The record provided does not show enactment, but the promise was framed as opposition rather than securing final passage, and her amendment directly matched the promised action.