Refuse to vote to fund Pentagon spending without transparency and accountability.

Val T. Hoyle · Oregon · Democratic

oversight impact 0.64 specificity 0.83 extraction confidence 93%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

"House Not In Session" and "Next Session: June 29th, 2026 at 12:00 PM" on the Clerk's current Roll Call Votes page.

The House was not in session during the June 26-28 lookback window, so there was no floor vote opportunity to confirm a new refusal to fund Pentagon spending. This leaves the promise unresolved in the latest window.

unresolved same_term

Roll Call Votes | Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 87%

Contest this evidence item

Hoyle said the bill was intended "to prevent Congress from fast-tracking funding for a war in Iran through a backdoor budget process" and that Congress should have "a transparent process and an up or down vote in Congress."

Hoyle took a concrete anti-war-funding action tied to transparency and an up-or-down vote, which is directionally consistent with the claim, but it is not a direct Pentagon-spending vote and falls outside the 3-day lookback window.

partial same_term A for effort

REP. HOYLE INTRODUCES THE NO WAR APPROPRIATIONS THROUGH RECONCILIATION ACT | Congresswoman Val Hoyle
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 71%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

unresolved unknown A for effort

Hoyle did take a concrete anti-war funding step by introducing legislation aimed at preventing fast-tracked war funding and pushing for a transparent, up-or-down congressional process, which is directionally consistent with the promise. But the cited evidence does not show an actual refusal vote on Pentagon spending, and the House was not in session in the relevant window, so the specific promise is not yet confirmed as fulfilled or failed.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 84%