introduced the National Defense Data Resilience Act ... establishes mandatory RTOs for different thresholds of data across federal agencies, including the Pentagon, and establishes data recovery capability requirements for the data. The bill also requires the Secretary to submit a data recovery strategy for the Department of Defense.
Establish mandatory recovery time objectives for federal data across federal agencies and require the Department of Defense to submit a data recovery strategy.
Occurrences
Evidence
GovInfo lists H.R. 8710 as introduced by Mr. Subramanyam for himself and Mr. McCormick on May 7, 2026, referred to the House Committee on Armed Services. The bill title would require the Secretary of Defense to implement resilient capabilities to recover critical Department of Defense data.
MeriTalk reported that Reps. Suhas Subramanyam and Richard McCormick introduced the National Defense Data Resilience Act on May 7. If enacted, it would require DoD recovery time objectives for critical data within 180 days and important or necessary data within 270 days, plus a DoD data recovery strategy covering RTOs, technology, oversight, and funding. The article said the bill was referred to House Armed Services and appeared to have no Senate companion.
The amendment was offered by Mr. Subramanyam of Virginia to Rules Committee Print 119-8 and would add a section titled Data Recovery Requirements and Strategy. It directed the Secretary of Defense to designate essential data categories and establish mandatory recovery time objectives, including within 180 days for critical data.
Congress.gov lists H.R. 3838 as passed by the House and received in the Senate, while related bill S.1071 became Public Law 119-60 on December 18, 2025. Review of the House-passed H.R. 3838 text found no matching data-recovery provisions for recovery time objectives, section 391c, or recovery certification.
SC Media described the National Defense Data Resilience Act as a Subramanyam-McCormick bill that would require DoD to identify mission-critical data, establish mandatory recovery time objectives, deploy recovery capabilities, test them, and report results to Congress. It also framed DoD as a starting point for a broader federal standard, not a government-wide mandate already in force.
Assessments
Subramanyam materially advanced the promise in the 119th Congress by offering NDAA amendment text and introducing H.R. 8710, the National Defense Data Resilience Act, which closely matches the DoD recovery-time-objective and recovery-strategy portions. However, the bill has only been introduced and referred to the House Armed Services Committee, and the earlier NDAA path does not appear to have enacted the promised provisions. The broader promise also includes mandatory recovery time objectives across federal agencies, which has not been shown to be in force. Because the candidate is still in office and the main bill is pending rather than definitively dead, this is unresolved, with credit for serious same-term effort.