and start to roll back some of the overly burdensome EPA and Dodd-Frank financial regulations that are destroying our economy.
Roll back burdensome EPA and Dodd-Frank financial regulations.
Occurrences
Evidence
On May 13, 2026, Rogers voted "Yea" on passage of H.R. 1346, the "Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025," and "Nay" on the motion to recommit. The page identifies the bill as a Clean Air Act ethanol-waiver measure, showing recent support for rolling back an EPA-related regulatory burden.
Congress.gov describes H.R. 1346 as a bill that amends the Clean Air Act, extends the Reid Vapor Pressure waiver to E15, nullifies existing state exclusions, and directs EPA to return compliance credits to some small refineries.
The official House vote record for Mike Rogers lists his June 3, 4, 8, and 9, 2026 floor votes. The recorded items are on labor, Treasury process, fraud-prevention, appropriations, and war-powers matters; no EPA or Dodd-Frank rollback bill appears in the visible June entries.
Reporting on the EPA's May 2026 proposal says the agency moved to repeal drinking-water limits on four PFAS chemicals and delay compliance deadlines for two others, which is a concrete rollback of environmental regulation within the lookback window.
The report says the CFPB deleted more than 2,200 webpages, while the acting director froze work, dropped enforcement cases, and tried to shrink the agency. Because the CFPB was created by Dodd-Frank, this is a concrete sign of retrenchment in the financial-regulation space during the lookback window.
Assessments
Rogers has some credit on the EPA side because he directly supported H.R. 1346 in May 2026, a deregulatory Clean Air Act measure that would ease EPA-linked compliance burdens. But the evidence provided does not show him delivering a rollback of Dodd-Frank itself, and the clearest financial-regulation and broader EPA pullbacks in the record are actions by the Trump administration and agencies rather than a Rogers-led legislative win. Because the promise bundled both EPA and Dodd-Frank rollbacks, and Rogers's direct contribution shown here is limited and incomplete, the best judgment is partial rather than full delivery. The relevant actions came long after the 2002 campaign context, so the timing is later_term.
The promise was broad rather than tied to a named bill or complete repeal. During Rogers's later House service, Congress and the executive branch did roll back relevant regulatory burdens in both areas: Congress enacted Dodd-Frank changes through the 2018 Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which Rogers supported on final House passage, and Congress also used the Congressional Review Act and other measures to repeal or ease environmental and agency rules, with Rogers supporting relevant rollback votes. Because these outcomes occurred well after the 2002 campaign term but while he remained in the same federal office, and because his contribution appears to be mainly as a supportive House vote rather than primary authorship, this counts as delivered with later-term timing rather than same-term delivery.