I will continue to stand with the Thin Blue Line... Congressman Harrigan will continue working to ensure that the men and women protecting this country are protected by gear that is genuinely built here.
I will continue working to ensure that law enforcement officers are protected by body armor that is genuinely made in America.
Occurrences
To require the Department of Justice to procure ballistic-resistant body armor manufactured using domestic ballistic fibers.
the bill would extend those same protections to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and state and local law enforcement
Evidence
Higgins said he would continue working on requiring law enforcement body armor to be American-made and announced introduction of the Ballistic Armor Made in America Act with Pat Harrigan and Sheri Biggs.
GovInfo records H.R. 8656 as introduced in the House on May 4, 2026 and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary; the short title is Ballistic Armor Made in America Act of 2026.
The official congressional office release says Higgins, along with Pat Harrigan and Sheri Biggs, introduced the Ballistic Armor Made in America Act to require body armor sold to law enforcement agencies as “Made in America” to contain domestically produced ballistic fibers, and Higgins said he would continue to stand with the effort.
GovInfo identifies H.R. 8656 as the Ballistic Armor Made in America Act of 2026, introduced in the House on May 4, 2026, and referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The introduced bill text would prohibit certain ballistic-resistant body armor from being marketed or sold as Made in America unless it contains ballistic fibers manufactured in the United States.
Higgins’s office announced that he, Pat Harrigan, and Sheri Biggs introduced the Ballistic Armor Made in America Act to ensure body armor sold to law enforcement as Made in America contains domestically produced ballistic fibers.
Congress.gov action history for H.R. 8656 shows the bill was introduced on May 4, 2026 and referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, with no enacted-law action shown in the cited record.
Assessments
Higgins materially advanced the issue in the same federal term by introducing H.R. 8656, the Ballistic Armor Made in America Act of 2026, which directly targeted the Made-in-America body-armor loophole for law enforcement. However, the record provided shows only introduction and committee referral, with no enactment or implemented protection ensuring officers receive genuinely American-made body armor. Under the instruction for serious but unsuccessful legislative attempts, this counts as not delivered with an effort badge rather than full or partial delivery.
Higgins took concrete same-term action by introducing the Ballistic Armor Made in America Act of 2026 to require domestically produced ballistic fibers in body armor marketed to law enforcement as made in America. That is material progress directly tied to the promise, but the evidence only shows introduction and referral to committee, not enactment or implemented protection standards. Because he advanced the promise in office but did not yet secure the promised outcome, this is best scored as partial rather than delivered.
Higgins took concrete same-term action by introducing H.R. 8656, the Ballistic Armor Made in America Act of 2026, aimed at requiring law enforcement body armor to be genuinely made in America. However, the evidence only shows introduction and committee referral, not passage or implementation. Because the promised policy outcome has not been delivered but he materially advanced legislation toward it, this merits partial credit with an effort badge.