...will continue to fight for more funds for education, prevention, and treatment programs.
He will continue to fight for more federal funding to combat opioids, including education, prevention, and treatment programs.
Occurrences
Evidence
The homepage says the office is in the congressional primary blackout period through June 23, 2026, but that regular website updates and constituent services will continue. It also links a FY2027 Programmatic Appropriations Form and lists June 16, 2026 as the latest news item.
The committees page says Harris serves on the House Appropriations Committee and its Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies subcommittee.
Harris's official committees page says he serves on House Appropriations and on the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies subcommittee.
Harris's press-release index says he applauded an HHS award of $2,715,203 to Salisbury-based AKYSO Therapeutics LLC for research on a new opioid use disorder treatment.
NIH says the HEAL Initiative is congressionally funded and works to improve prevention and treatment strategies for opioid misuse and addiction and pain management.
NIH lists active HEAL funding opportunities for substance use disorder and overdose interventions, prevention, recovery services, implementation, and health services research.
SAMHSA's State Opioid Response NOFO listed $1,480,500,000 in anticipated available funding for opioid misuse, OUD, overdose, prevention, treatment, harm reduction, and recovery services.
The enacted FY2024 Labor-HHS division funded substance abuse prevention at $236,879,000 and included opioid-related NIH transfer authority and State Opioid Response Grants language.
The Clerk records the House vote on H.Res.1102 for concurrence in the Senate amendment to H.R.2882 as passed, and records Harris, Republican of Maryland, voting Nay.
Assessments
Federal opioid-related funding continued during Harris's current House term, including SAMHSA State Opioid Response funding, NIH HEAL-related opportunities, and an HHS opioid-use-disorder research award in his district. Harris also holds a relevant Appropriations and Labor-HHS subcommittee role. However, the evidence does not show that he authored, sponsored, requested, or materially secured increased opioid education, prevention, or treatment funding, and he voted against the FY2024 appropriations vehicle that contained opioid- and substance-abuse-related funding. The outcome therefore receives partial credit for relevant federal funding occurring in-office, but not full delivery because candidate-specific contribution is weak.
Harris remains in federal office and on the appropriations subcommittee that handles health spending, but the evidence does not show a specific opioid-funding increase, enacted measure, or even a clearly documented opioid-focused legislative push tied to this promise. That makes the claim still unresolved rather than delivered or failed.