While Republicans continue advancing harmful, anti-worker policies, I’ll keep fighting for the dignity of work.
Continue fighting for the dignity of work and oppose efforts to strip the Federal Reserve's maximum-employment mandate.
Occurrences
Evidence
On May 13, 2026, Pressley said she "vigorously oppose[d]" legislation to strip the Federal Reserve's mandate for maximum employment and argued that "the dignity of work is transformational" and that the Fed's maximum-employment mandate is essential.
The House Financial Services Committee marked up H.R. 5396, the Price Stability Act of 2025, and ordered it reported favorably by a recorded vote of 30 yeas and 21 nays. The repository also records that Pressley offered amendments to H.R. 5396, including amendments that were not agreed to and one that was ruled nongermane.
Pressley said she "vigorously oppose[d]" legislation to strip the Federal Reserve's maximum-employment mandate, argued that work is dignity, and said she was fighting for people seeking jobs. Her office also said she offered four amendments during the markup to affirm the importance of the mandate.
The House Financial Services Committee record says H.R. 5396, the Price Stability Act of 2025, was ordered reported favorably by 30 yeas to 21 nays. It also records three Pressley amendments to H.R. 5396 as not agreed to by recorded votes and one Pressley amendment as ruled out of order as nongermane.
The introduced bill text states that H.R. 5396 would amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the Board of Governors' and FOMC's focus on maximum employment. Section 2 would strike "maximum employment, stable prices" and insert "stable prices."
Pressley's letter to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stated that the Fed has a statutory mandate to promote maximum employment for all people and asked what steps the Fed would take to continue upholding that mandate for Black women.
Pressley's office announced that she and Rep. Summer Lee introduced the Better Labor Statistics Act to codify monthly unemployment reporting and demographic labor data, while noting her repeated calls for the Federal Reserve to act on rising unemployment.
Assessments
The promise was advocacy-oriented: to continue fighting for worker dignity and oppose efforts to remove the Federal Reserve's maximum-employment mandate. During the same federal House term, Pressley publicly opposed H.R. 5396, described the maximum-employment mandate as essential, offered multiple amendments during committee markup, introduced related labor-market legislation, and pressed the Fed on maximum employment. The opposed bill advanced in committee, but the promised conduct was continued opposition and advocacy, which she carried out.
The promise was framed as continued advocacy and opposition, not as guaranteeing defeat of the bill. In her federal House role, Pressley publicly opposed legislation stripping the Federal Reserve's maximum-employment mandate and materially engaged in the committee process through amendments during the same term. Even though the bill advanced in committee, the promised conduct was to keep fighting and oppose the effort, which the evidence supports.